Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "A.Appleyard" <A.APPLEYARD@fs*.mt*.um*.ac*.uk*>
To: techdiver@terra.net
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 15:15:02 BST
Subject: How useful will computerized mixture rebreathers be?
  When computerized rebreathers are finally developed and on sale, how useful
will they be? Sport, yes; but how far will work divers (who seem to me to be
more able to make use of the long durations of dive that some of these sets
provide) be able to use the resulting freedom without running foul of infinity
laws tying divers to air lines and all sorts making it nearly as heavy and
cumbersome as the old-style standard gear? (When the North Sea (off Europe
between England and Scandinavia)) oil boom started, the British government
passed a work diving law, and I read in a newspaper that working biologists
had to fight #@%$ hard in Parliament to be allowed to continue using scuba
without air lines and lifelines.
  It seems that a time is coming in work diving analogous to the habit of
overcautious councils slapping on universal 30mph speed limits everywhere
without thinking whether they are needed, until many motorists say "the law is
an ass" and drive by the road conditions. Likewise I wonder whether the
line-less freedom of the scuba, which Cousteau gave us, will have (in work
diving) have to be fought for all over again, e.g. by when it is suitable
practically using mixture rebreathers without lines, systematically ignoring
the law until the law is repealed or changed [1]. I suspect that the only
reason why laws "you must have a line and a linesman" were not extended to all
diving including sport diving, was the size and weight of the sport diving
trade. Lines can be a @#$% causing drag and delay and getting tangled in
things. Likeways I feel that laws saying that work divers can't breathe heliox
from scuba, only from lines, don't deserve to be respected when practical
conditions advise the opposite. (How much of this is a fear that helium gas
supplying companies will lose profit if methods that use less heliox per
heliox dive become common?) What is the state of the law about work divers
breathing nitrox from scuba or from a lifeline?

  [1] A silly-sounding but true example of a law which became an ass, was when
(before practical electric lights were invented) a law was passed that a
railway engine must have an oil lamp on the front for safety (i.e. not a
pathetic glimmer of a lantern with one tallow candle in); OK for a while,
until a railway company was prosecuted for running a railway engine without an
oil lamp although it had an adequate front electric light on.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]