Mike Halliwell does a good job in uncovering some of the structural aspects of DIN and Yoke regulator connections. While shear stress and axial stress are present in yoke connections, I suspect the culprit for yokes and DIN connections to be stress primarily caused by bending (stress is defined as the applied force divided by the area over which it is applied). Unfortuantely in a linear structural system all three stress sources add to create a combined stress state. The axial force on a typical yoke with a 3000 psi fill would be about 1154 lbs. A brass yoke with two "arms" with dimensions of .25" x .6" x 1.25" would have and axially applied stress of about 3078 lbs/sq.inch and would stretch about .00025" due to the axial force caused by the air pressure acting on the O-ring seal face. The 3078 psi stress is well below the failure strength for the brass material. The ideally largest gap through which an O-ring, with a typical hardness in SCUBA applications, will not extrude with a 1500psi pressure load is about .003". The axial stretching due to the pressure accounts for about 10% of the maximum ideal gap. The reality is the gap can be somewhat wider. In static conditions I have used .003" gaps in excess of 10,000psi with no problems. So axial loading alone will not cause extrusion in a properly connected yoke connection. Now if the regulator body somehow is in direct shear, the recess that the regulator seal face fits in will tend to limit the lateral motion and thus the shearing in the yoke arms. Still this add somewhat to the combined total stress. On the other hand, if you bang the regulator body you tend to arc, or bend, the yoke arms. You create a bending force which is a function of mass of the equipment and yourself, the velocity at which you are traveling, and the deceleration time to stop. The deceration time can almost be instantaneous and the mass can be large if your harness is tight. The applied bending force tends to rock the seal face on the regulator away from the O-ring, but it does not do it evenly. It creates a wider gap at some segment of the O-ring. The pressure force which tends to seal the O-ring in the gap will now cause the O-ring to extrude through this widened gap segment. The yoke arms may or may not be permanently deformed. If not the gap may open during the impact and the O-ring extrude; the gap would attempt to close and would cut the O-ring. If the yoke is permanently deformed the O-ring would extrude and the gap would be uneven around the seal. I have yet to see a yoke break off from an impact (this doesn't mean it can't happen), but I have seen bent yokes and extruded O-rings. As Mike said there is a lot of material in the yoke arms; but there is also a long distance over which the bending occurs (1.25"on one of my yokes). This tends to distribute the stress such that the yoke would generally not break but may be deformed on large impacts. The DIN connection suffers the same applied forces. Only in the case of a DIN connection the bending force (more correctly the bending moment) acts on a very small cross-section (small 2nd moment of inertia for those who care) of metal at the joint of the hollow tube at the body of the regulator. Since the connection into the tank valve is very rigid compared to a yoke, the energy of the applied force is concentrated at the joint on the regulator. On regulators with small tube diameters such as the Poseidon this may cause breakage (I've seen two broken Poseidon DIN connections as a result of falling tanks). DIN connections with a large cross-section of metal at the connection (greater 2nd moment) will fair better. This is probably why the US Divers DIN connection mentioned in a previous post faired better than the Poseidons? I prefer the DIN connection mainly due to the captivated O-Ring and the compact valve-regulator arrangment; however I used yokes for quite some time on a set of 72s with no failures. I believe an extruded O-ring in a yoke connection is more likely to happen than breaking off a DIN connection in the water. It appears most of the DIN failures are due to falling tanks => so don't drop the tanks. And there is no substitute for good technique! Thanks, Doug Chapman
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]