Tony, > Then why do they work when I make up a mix using real gas laws as my basis > for partial pressure mixing calculations? All I do is perform the > calculations, mix accordingly, calibrate my sensor with air, and presto! On > the first pass my mix is usually within 1 to 2 percent of the desired > percentage. Oh sure, its not perfect, but it seems to work pretty good even > when making mixes with high FO2's. Thats because you don't actually know what your mix is when you finish. I'll elaborate. Step 1 - figure your mix, get whatever percentage O2 for your dive. Step 2 - (for simplicity sake) drain air out of your tank. (I KNOW you don't have too) Step 3 - Put x psi of O2 into tank. Step 4 - Top off with air until you hit x psi. Unless steps 3 and 4 are done very slowly, and the tanks are allowed to cool to the SAME temperature at each pressure measurement, you'll be off. Most dive shops I've seen don't do that. So, at a dive shop, your computed psi's won't mean as much since they usually don't take into account much in the way of temp adjustments to pressure, and they often fill at different rates from different banks, so the temp will be different for the air top off and the O2. Now, you measure the O2. The gases may not be mixed well. I've seen a dive shop take a tank sit it on the floor, and roll it back and forth a few times and announce the mix is homogeneous. Well, the CGA standards call for rolling at a specified (and not remembered) rpm for a period of time which I believe is an hour. A couple of kicks won't do it. (I know that there is argument about if this is necessary - don't bust my chops on this, thats what the book says is needed for a mixture to become homogeneous) So, now you calibrate your O2 sensor at 21%. You do your mix. What do you know? Not much. You know that your fg's are dependenant on the accuracy of your PSI measurement, which you know is off. But you don't know by how much. You know that your O2 sensor will be off somewhere from 2-8% w/ a calibration of 21%. (which should be 20.9%). Does the PSI off cancel the O2 off? Are the errors additive? Did they cancel? Point is, you don't know. In order to know, you *HAVE* to calibrate the sensor with a gas that is within 4% of the target value, or you *DON'T* know. You're guessing. > Have you run any head to head comparisons between the two types? - Tony Not personally. But I have spec sheets from both sensor types, and the electrochemical ones are not ones that I'd choose for a life critical application. They don't even have repeatability within 1%, its +/- 2% for the sensors that come with the mini-ox units. The electrochemical sensors with repeatability of +/- 0.25% cost almost $400 a unit. The paramagnetic units are repeatable to +/1 0.1%, accurate to within 0.25% full scale, and linear from 0-100% O2, have neglegible histeresis (sp?), and never have to be replaced. (Calibrated once every 5 years or so). -- /***************************************************************************/ /* William E. Sadler | email: sadler_b@bs*.bs*.bl*.co* */ /* | batchmo@cr*.co* */ /* Divers Down! [\] | CI$: 71005,1241 */ /* | POTS: (404) 332-2314 */ /***************************************************************************/ /* Keep your Honor, be Bold, and remember: */ /* The only things in the middle of the road are yellow stripes and */ /* squished possums. */ /***************************************************************************/
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]