Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 20:14:00 -0700
From: fdc02@ix*.ne*.co* (Doug Chapman )
Subject: Composite SCUBA Tanks
To: techdiver@terra.net
Composite materials (e.g. glass, aramid, graphite, and/or carbon fibers 
embedded in a plastic matrix such as epoxy) can be used very 
effectively for internally pressurized pressure vessels such as SCUBA 
tanks and have been in commercial service for quite some time now.  The 
technology required to design a safe composite tank is well developed. 
The main advantage of composite material construction is the high 
strength-to-weight ratio and mechanical stiffness-to-weight ratio 
attainable in composite constructions. This provides for relatively 
high pressure capability at a reasonable finished tank weight for a 
given volumetric capacity (compared to steel and aluminum).  An 
internally pressurized tank is an ideal application for composite 
materials; although the valve attachment location can pose a bit of 
concern. This is one reason a liner (steel or aluminum) is used in a 
composite tank. The valve connection is accommodated in the liner 
material and the fiber wraps around the protruding connection.  This 
area in the liner can be "stronger" than the rest of the liner to allow 
for the reductions in strength and stiffness in the composite material 
wrapped around the valve attachment. The liner also provides the 
mandrel on which the composite materials are wound; it also provides a 
barrier to gas leakage through the wall of the tank since the composite 
materials are not impermeable to air.

The choice of materials can be another area of debate. The use of 
graphite or carbon fibers in very high pressure tanks is common 
practice for tanks that are not submerged. However graphite and carbon 
fibers are electrically conductive and can form an electrochemical 
corrosion problem when submerged long-term in water. Epoxy resins 
commonly used in composites do absorb a bit of water, although much 
less than polyester or vinylester resins typical in boat construction.  
Graphite and carbon materials do not typically have good impact 
properties. Other materials which may have good service in submerged 
SCUBA tank applications include aramid fibers (KEVLAR) or glass fibers. 
The higher pressure tanks would probably use aramids due to their high 
stiffness properties compared to glass fibers. Aramids also have good 
impact properties. They are comparably difficult to work with; they do 
not wet with the resins as well as other materials. They are fairly 
expensive although much less than graphite or carbon. 

The real problem with composite SCUBA tanks is the relatively low 
damage tolerance compared to steel for example. If you point impact 
(bang) a composite tank you may not observe any damage on the exterior 
of the tank other than scrapings. There may however be damage within 
the composite laminate (i.e. the individual layers or fibers may debond 
as a result in fractures in the plastic matrix material). This creates 
a local defect in the tank wall which will generally get worse with 
service (i.e. the fractures will propagate). You may or may not notice 
a dent in the liner during an internal inspection. Additional 
inspection techniques such as ultrasonic inspection and acoustic 
emmissions inspection should be required for SCUBA tanks considering 
the relatively rough service a SCUBA tank experiences. Hydrostatic 
testing of the tank alone is not sufficient to adequately inspect the 
tank.

It is my guess that LUXFER is inspecting these composite tanks 
mentioned in previous postings not in reference to their ability to 
design a tank to hold the desired pressure, but to see how much damage 
a composite SCUBA tank experiences during typical usage. It would very 
interesting to see their conclusions. I suspect it will be a while 
before we see composite tanks in the hands of the general diving 
community as higher capacity substitutes for the present steel and 
aluminum tanks. When they come, their service life will probably be 
relatively short, and they will be expensive? However certain 
applications may justify their use. Just for thought!
Doug Chapman 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]