Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Re: Challenge to present assumptions on deco theory
To: dlv@ga*.ne* (Dan Volker)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 13:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: techdiver@terra.net (techdiver)
From: zimmmt@au*.al*.co* (Mike Zimmerman)
> on diver safety. A sedentary person  with a poor VO2 max (ability to 
> transfer O2 throughout body) will have a safe single dive inside the limits 
> of no stop diving, but should this same person do multiple dives, their 
> ability to offgas will not keep pace with the model predictions. 

Now my understanding of deco theory mostly stops after the math,
and even then mostly only simple Haldanean, but when I see a statement
like this last one, I ask myself "if they offgas slowly, wouldn't they
also have ONgassed slowly as well?".  And if so, isn't likely
to turn into some kind of a proportional problem (ie. its all
a wash?).  The only "hole" I see in this is that perhaps the model
should then include a "slower" tissue where it normally wouldn't
and would need to take into account the offgassing there.  Maybe
I just answered my own question, but....

Just curious.  Corrections, references welcome.  Flames to /dev/null.

Mike
-- 
Mike Zimmerman < zimmmt@au*.al*.co* >   Alcatel Network Sytems, Ral, NC  
*My opinions, not Alcatel's*      [\] NC Diving: http://www.vnet.com/scuba/
A is A.    Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt man doing it.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]