Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 23:45:40 -0400
From: Carl Heinzl <cgh@ma*.ai*.mi*.ed*>
To: Private_User@fo*.co*
Cc: UXMA73A@pr*.co*, techdiver@terra.net
Subject: IANTD Teaching

>In the old days the rule was PPO2 of 2.0 at approx 256' on air was ok.
>The tech. community has changed.  It will continue to change as needed.

If you give an "approx", you should at LEAST be in the ballpark, 256'
isn't even close.  What's *REALLY* scary is that you didn't recognize
it.

I suggest you go back and read some introductory books perhaps rework
some math, and NO do NOT use a calculator, they've become so much of a
crutch that people can no longer do rough calculations in their head
so when they get WRONG answers they don't even realize it!!!  Hell,
even sitting at my desk (actually, I'm in bed right now, I'm going
down to my desk in a few minutes to knock off some work) I know that a
PPO2 at 2.0 ATA is at 9atm down, which is 297 ft using 20% O2 in air
as a baseline.  That's without a calculator and without any thinking.

Using 20.9% (which is more accurate), 2.0 PPO2 will work out to some
depth LESS than 297'.  Using some good old fashioned common sense and
a little mental arithmetic, I can take 1/20 of the total depth (to add
1%, then take away 1/10 of that to come up with 20.9 - if you didn't
follow this part, ok) to come up with roughly 283'.  It took me much
longer to type this than to do the math, and I type very well.

You should even be able to do this last calculation without too much
difficulty or any "on line" calculations that you might have to do
under stress will really be suspect.

-Carl-


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]