Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: 08 Sep 95 13:10:29 EDT
From: "William W. Mee" <75104.532@co*.co*>
To: Tech Diver <Techdiver@terra.net>
Subject: IANTD Teaching
IANTD TEACHINGS

For Profit Ceritifcation agaencies, such as IANTD  thrive on conveying images of
diving adventure,  excitement and glory to the aspiring technical diver.  They
would have you believe that armed with their version of technical diving
training almost any diving objective is within your each, limited only by  your
acceptance of  risk.  In the interests of self  promotion and to whet the
appetites of the ever swelling  pool of uninitiated recruits from the ranks of
sport diving, these organizations promote practices that are blatantly foolish,
teaching standards which are riddled with inadequacies and misinformation and an
almost complete disregard for the physical health requirements imposed by
extreme diving.  This sorry state of affairs not only  places the uniformed at
mortal risk, but has helped to compile a shocking death list.

What IANTD and others dont tell you is the list of fatalities in technical
diving compiled over the last 5 years and a short personal history of the
unfortunate individuals who believed in pursuing the adventure of the final
frontier.  We knew a great number of these people and in many instances were
personally touched by their deaths.  Most of these deaths were caused by what
you might euphemistically call diver error. Many of these so called errors
are part and parcel of the training practices promulgated by these for profit
agencies.  Let me name three of the prime offenders:  High PPN2 (>3.9 ATA), High
O2 (>1.4 ATA) and trying to do things cheaply so as to save money (dont invest
several extra dollars on Helium, line arrows and tank markings) .  Sure, all of
us out there can tolerate > 3.9 ATA N2, but nobody will deny that it
progressively clouds your judgement and when  the crap hits the fan  beyond
3.9 things have a very convenient way of snowballing out of control (ask anyone
who regularly does it and ask about the baseball bat criteria).  Why not spend
the 5$ or 20$ extra/dive and add the necessary helium to keep the PPN2 within
range?  The reason most people argue is that it costs too much, its too hard
to get or I dont have the time or IANTD  says I can be trained to overcome
the problems associated with high PPN2 (and thus save money).  Some of these
agencies (despite their own teachings which suggest that air is a bad gas for
almost everything) will try to tell you to overcome the Helium problem by using
ntirox at depths beyond its usefulness.  High PPO2 is not even worth discussing,
because its misuse is so dangerous and obvious.  Go ahead and try to swim on 1.6
ATA PPO2 and after 45 minutes you feel horrible, have fogged vision and will be
staring at death. Ask anyone who has flirted with the toxicity limits of O2.
How many times have you noticed bronchial irritiation and congestion following
long (and prescribed High PPO2 decompressions ).  These certification agencies
have conveniently scaled, what they claimed were allowable PPO2s, downward as
the fatality list grew.  They are now proposing all kinds of outlandish schemes
for bottle and regulator  identification when the underlying problem is improper
use of Nitrox by incorrectly trained or physically unfit people in the first
place.  But by far and away the biggest sin is teaching people that they can
technical dive on a budget.  Sure they tell you that all of the equipment and
training will cost you plenty, but when the time comes to dive, do it as cheaply
as possible.  This means that use cheaper oxygen, when you can, in place of
helium (Deep nitrox) or worse use poor mans mixes instead of the correct mix,
beause the one bottle of helium which you bought has to last you and your
buddies all year (they love to teach you all about trimix diving, but when it
comes to brewing up the right mix  they pull the good deep on air foolishness
and go with the 17/17 stuff). If you dont believe me just ask anyone.   The
very worst example of cheapness is the pathetic cave diving instruction which
teaches students not to spend money at all on basic things like line arrows.
Dont even ask how many people have been killed over the past five years because
they became confused in North Florida or Mexican caves, but for several $.75
arrows.  Ask yourself what your own life is worth.  When we are afflicted by a
serious illness or injured in an accident the cost of recovery is never an
issure, so why is it an issue in so called technical diving ?  Would you spend
an extra $25 to still be alive?  How about 75 cents?  When we reexamine the cost
vs life checklist the numbers that come up are pretty disturbing.

Be advised and take a long hard look at the real agenda of these agencies. You
may not like what you uncover.


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]