Andy, I think that we have a very grey zone in the EMail issue. Is this covered strictly as a "written" medium, or does it blur over into the "speech" arena. Most people will agree that when we speak in public, that we may be quoted without infringing our copyright to that speech. We hope that the quotes will be accurate and not taken out of context, but hope is all we have. When I write an article for a magazine, or a chapter for a book, I fully expect that to be covered by copyright, and I (and my editors) take time to make sure that what is printed is exactly (hopefully) what I meant to say. However, many times I say things (and here the grey zone comes into play, because I often "speak" on CIS or on the 'net without the contemplation and polishing that goes with my written work) both verbally and via electonic postings that I do not consider to be equivalent to my written work. Also, realize that either the sender OR the recipient of a written message has the right to release that message into the public view. Again, it gets grey when we have things like the techdiver echo, or the cavers@co* echo, as the messages are explicitly sent to a vast number of subscribers. It becomes grey when we try and figure out if each of these recipient's are to be treated like the recipient of private EMail, or are we to be treated like purchasers of newspapers (who have no right to distribute, or reprint the material they receive). John
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]