Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
MARK WELZEL sez: > >From what I've seen and heard on the net, there is no data supporting > the use of a ppO2 lower than 1.6. I would still love to hear some real > unbiased experiences at 1.6 that show that ppO2 to be the sole > factor in an incident. You keep repeating this statement, but I think you are missing something rather critical: the important thing is not whether a given ppO2 is the *sole* factor, but rather if it is a *contributing* factor. Guarding against a single point of failure is relatively easy, and gives a certain degree of survivability. But is that enough? The real killer incidents are when several things go wrong at once; as the stress factor rises, is your 1.6 ppO2 still an asset, or has it suddenly become a (rather serious) liability? -frank -- fhd@in*.ne* | [M]athematics is not the study of intangible Platonic 1 212 559 5534 | worlds, but of tangible formal systems which have arisen 1 917 992 2248 | from real human activities. 1 718 746 7061 | -- Saunders MacLane
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]