Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Frank Deutschmann <fhd@in*.ne*>
Subject: Re: Physical Effect At Depth
To: rbell@cp*.or* (Ronnie Bell)
Date: Wed, 24 May 1995 13:36:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: rwfavorite@uc*.ed*, DeepTek@ao*.co*, techdiver@terra.net
Ronnie Bell sez:
> Lets say I am diving a cave that has 90 percent of the passage at 110 and 
> 10 percent at 160. I am not going to use mix for that dive! For me it's 
> just not that dangerous .

Um, I don't get it; Air at 160 fsw is a PPO2 of 1.2 ATA.  What's the problem?
( A 1.4 ATA O2 limit would limit air depth to 190 fsw.)

> I seem to recall that the limit used to be 1.8, then went to 1.6 now I 
> hear a call for 1.4. Hmmmmmm?

From memory, didn't the US Navy establish a PPO2 limit of 1.2 ATA waaayyy back
when?  (This doesn't get much publicity, but I'm fairly sure it is accurate.)

-frank
(Who keeps his PPO2 levels at or below 1.2 ATA, and likes it that way.)
-- 
fhd@in*.ne*  | [M]athematics is not the study of intangible Platonic
1 212 559 5534     | worlds, but of tangible formal systems which have arisen
1 917 992 2248     | from real human activities.
1 718 746 7061     | 	--  Saunders MacLane

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]