Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: <giii01@In*.Co*>
To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Philosophy questions - was: O2 toxicity
From: mdufour@CA*.OR* (Marc Dufour)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 10:39:11 -0500
>     Why is this the only sport where participants
>try to do things every way other than the way the 
>pro's do it?

   Why bother with all the sport technical certifications and instead head 
straight for a commercial diving course? Seems that way one will be taught 
directly (and faster, and cheaper) all things about pots, trimix, 
full-faces, helmets, plus how it is *REALLY* done by pros? Or do we have a 
bunch of marketers that, since they are dealing with a sport, can feel free 
to goof the gullible "sportsman with $$$" (no flame intended)???

   Is there any other sport that is that close to a commercial or military 
activity? (skydiving, maybe - there are pro skydivers, but they're hardly 
commercial. Maybe one day we'll see "recreational astro-nuts" who'll do 
things the other way than asteroid minters do - like changing spacesuit 
underwear every day :) ). Or is "tech diving" no longer a sport? (must be, 
one pays for his own way)...

   I'll never forget one on my aunt's reaction when I told her, as a kid, 
that I wanted to SCUBA dive for fun: "But... It's a job!"
---=========================================================---
    Marc Dufour, alias mdufour@ca*.or* depuis 1994
    [\] ACUC 6 31874             http://WWW.CAM.ORG/~mdufour

"The study of architecture is a marvelous training for anything 
 but architecture.   The frightening thought that what you draw 
 may become a building makes for reasoned lines".

                                   Saul Steinberg, Milano, 1933

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]