Is there a study that compares profiles generated by the different programs out there today? I know that some are configurable and that the results will vary according to how conservative you choose to be on your settings. However I would like to see a comparison of may be 100 popular profiles on air/EANx/mix with the default/recommended/standard settings (there must be a way to compare them). These would have the added value of measuring up our own settings against a reference. Then we can choose to be more/less conservative in reference to something as opposed to just more/less conservative. If such study does not exist, let me know if you would like to participate by defining standards, profiles, settings for each piece of software, running the simulations... (hoo@in*.ne*) Take care, Ed.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]