Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "George Irvine" <girvine@be*.ne*>
To: "Brian Hunter" <hunter49689@co*.ne*>,
     "'Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com'" ,
     "Quest@Gu*. Com"
Subject: RE: [dir-asia] Digest Number 102
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:10:06 -0400
Brian, even if Mouth and the Slob wanted to do anything correctly, which
they would have to get outside help to explain that to them, they can not
because the mail order assholes they have in their mile-long list of
"instructors" merely go to whomever has the least requirements. If Mouth
tries to institute any kind of standards that would make sense ( not that he
would), the idiots just teach TDI. If TDI does something they don't like,
they teach IANTD. For instance, currently most of what IANTD requires in its
"standards" ( LOL ) are direct violations of DIR. So those IANTD
"instructors" who are pretending to teach "DIR" because they think it
attracts students that can be fooled merely switch for the moment ( most of
them are dually listed) teach TDI in that case because apparently TDI does
not have any rule against DIR ( probably because they would not know DIR
from DUI).

This is a really sad state of affairs where those two large "tech" ( again,
LOL ) "training" agencies have to compete for the bottom of the barrel.

Now, I see that the Mouth has appointed Joe Ditturi training director, and
blames issues on him. Well, Mouth is the one who created this bag of shit,
and Ditturi had nothing to do with it. Ditturi, at last check, was in the
Navy, and if you look at the most recent IANTD disaster report on here, you
will see nothing that the Navy would allow in any respect. Just to prove my
point, I will tell you all right now that Joe Ditturi will have zero impact
on anything to do with training at IANTD simply because if he even tried to
institute what his background would indicate is right, there would be one
instructor left at IANTD - himself. They would all be over in Margaritaville
with the Slob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Hunter [mailto:hunter49689@co*.ne*]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 10:30 AM
To: 'George Irvine'; girvine@be*.ne*; 'Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com'
Subject: RE: [dir-asia] Digest Number 102


   George,
 You're not telling me any thing I don't already know. IANTD and TDI are
idiots, but as I said in the last email if you read the owners manual
and it says not to use past a certain depth and someone wants you to you
simply thumb it and never dive with these strokes again. People MUST
take some responsibility for their own actions. The only person that can
look out for your safety 100% is your self.
 Brian Hunter


-----Original Message-----
From: George Irvine [mailto:trey@my*.ne*]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 7:35 AM
To: Brian Hunter; girvine@be*.ne*; 'Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com'
Subject: RE: [dir-asia] Digest Number 102

Brian, these IANTD strokes can't even get what is on page one of any
PADI
manual - the buddy system. They think it means "Buddy Inspiration". I
can
not believe Joe Ditturi is "training director" and presides over this
collection of clowns. Of course, it is Mouth who is responsible for the
attitude of these big tough guys, not Ditturi, but as we can see, Mouth
is
pushing it off on Ditturi.

This who incident just exemplifies what a stroke is ( that IANTD
"instructor"), typified what is wrong with dive instruction and tech
diving,
and the part that none of these IANTD morons or other strokes get is
that
even the dead guy's wife, who says she is not a diver, clearly sees all
the
issues that any 5 year old child could understand in this situation.

That organization and the next one down the food chain ( TDI ) - if you
can
indeed rank idiocy, mediocrity, lack of integrity, and level of cavalier
attitude about human life - need a wakeup call, and everyone who is
participating in and or supporting these morons is part of the problem.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Hunter [mailto:hunter49689@co*.ne*]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 10:47 PM
To: girvine@be*.ne*; 'Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com'
Subject: RE: [dir-asia] Digest Number 102


 Sounds to me like the diver should have took some responsibility and
not participate in the dive, if he read the owners manual.
 Of course we all (SHOULD) know that IANTD is the biggest group of
idiots in the training business.
 I hate to hear of anyone dieing but come on use some common sense, if
the manual says not to take the unit past 130fsw don't do it! 99% of
YOUR safety is common sense.
 Brian Hunter


a. dive in excess of 200 feet;
b. perform a staged decompression dive without any formal training or
certification; and
c. ignore, or failed to supervise, the rebreather manufacturer's written
instructions on depth limits and oxygen mixture levels, were in fact
heeded and observed. (To quote the owners manual, "it is designed and
manufactured for recreational diving, and MUST NOT be used at depths
greater than 130 feet or for staged decompression diving").

5) On this same trip, there were also at least three other separate
rebreather dives my husband Julian carried out with Mr. Santos prior to
this last tragic dive, that were also made at depths beyond the
rebreather manufacturers warnings and limits.




--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]