Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 17:04:02 -0400
To: "Michael Barnette" <aocfishman@ho*.co*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
From: Capt JT <captjt@mi*.co*>
Subject: Re: credibility
Mike, you can pull all the stuff out of site and twist it any you way you 
want. The one thing I remember on your site that was funny as hell is when 
you put all your private emails on there when you and MZ were fighting. 
This was after several post you made of only perfect dives, never had a 
problem on any dive you said.......then we see you guys arguing over near 
deaths or fear of it happening. I was rolling..........then it was not long 
after that you guys had your accident, tried to keep it secret.........then 
I busted you........and you got so mad you had to start your own 
list.......something you could control........hide the truth.........Mike 
your trolling with bait that I will not bite on.........do yourself a 
favor........drink the WINE ;-)

and have a nice day


   At 05:07 PM 4/8/03 +0000, Michael Barnette wrote:
>It is interesting to note that other individuals from VBTECH are coming to 
>JT's rescue.  However, none of them can rebut any of the claims I have 
>made on JT's experience (or lack thereof), his lack of credibility, and 
>outright lies.  Instead, they try and bring up other peripheral issues 
>such as where I was formerly employed part-time.  You guys are doing a 
>heck of a job!  Do any of you know how many technical dives JT has done 
>past 150fsw?
>
>Brad, maybe you can look into taking Debating 101 while at school.  Take 
>notes for Tom.
>
>Since my first issue was how many technical dives JT has done past 150fsw, 
>can anyone present any credible evidence that suggests he has not done 
>only 43 technical dives (as suggested by his website and trip reports) in 
>the past six years?  If so, I again simply ask, how many technical dives 
>has JT done past 150fsw?  Please provide the evidence to support 
>this.  This would appear to be a fairly simple question.
>
>FYI:
>
>rebut:  1.  To refute, especially by offering opposing evidence or 
>arguments, as in a legal case.  2.  To present opposing evidence or arguments.
>
>credible:  1.  Capable of being believed; plausible.  2.  Worthy of 
>confidence; reliable.
>
>
>
>Michael C. Barnette
>Association of Underwater Explorers
>Because it's there...somewhere...maybe.
>http://www.mikey.net/aue
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


"You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in the 
water"
Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more
  Web Site  http://www.capt-jt.com/
Email     captjt@mi*.co*


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]