Glen I answered forward with no hate or discontent at all. I spoke what was on my mind and I pointed out she has no dick.....which is the truth. She is a she.......get it. I had exchanged several emails from her before I knew it was a her. Now let me answer who is learning something........not one of you who are posting are asking anything very real......though I have tried to put bits and pieces of info in each email, but you cannot see it, because you don't want to. It may be history. fact......ect The only questions I am getting that are legitimate are coming in private, because they are to GD afraid to post questions about Halycon.......GUE........WKPP........The Britannic..... and have to put up with George and his followers in the bashing that comes from asking the questions..... figure that..... and have a nice day At 09:15 PM 2/15/03 -0600, Glen Hunt wrote: >How tasteless can you be JT? Jan's post was not a challenge or threat of >any kind, but you replied unnecessarily with leud anotomical references, >then launched into big dog mode. Seriously, what was I intended to learn >from that display? > >Glen > > >----Original Message Follows---- >From: Capt JT <captjt@mi*.co*> >To: Jsuw@ao*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com >Subject: Re: >Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:49:29 -0500 > >Hi Jan >This is not the first exchange we have had and the others were pleasant >just as this one will be. Yes there is a huge swing in what each person >believes what techdiving is, just as some consider a 200ft depth an >extreme dive for them, Tom and I no longer even carry tables for such >dives. What is extreme for one is a cake walk for another. >You have never been accused of doing any dick waving.... but lets face it, >you don't have one ;-) >I respect newbie questions until they no longer are real questions , but >either meant to defame someone or kiss anothers ass. >If I don't know you, I will generally do a search of the name to see what >comes up........you would be surprised at the things I find. I even have >photos that I have found on some pretty strange web sites, the person >didn't even know was out there. If I were most of you out there I would do >a search on your own name and see what comes up. The info that others will >put out on the web that you think is hidden and forgotten, others will put >out there without a second thought. I retain all information I >can.........you never know when you will get to expose someone at just the >right time, when they are in a full swing of dick waving. > >Anyway......have a nice day > >At 11:08 PM 2/14/03 -0500, Jsuw@ao*.co* wrote: >>JT: >> >>Exactly what consitutes technical diving is open for debate. I don't >>have any plans to do 400' dives any time soon, if ever, but some would >>say the dives I've done are technical dives. In any case, I'm not a good >>example, since I don't do big dives by most people's definition of >>that. (I do dives in the 200' range, maybe a little deeper, with run >>times of 60-90 minutes max, using at most two deco gases.) >> >>I do have friends I dive with who do more than I do. The dives I do with >>them, and the ones they do without me that might be a bigger dive, are >>ones you don't hear about because there is nothing remarkable about >>them. They are not death-defying, they are not record setting, they are >>just fun dives. The only thing to be said about them afterward is that >>it was a great dive, a lot of fun, and a good way to spend time with >>friends who share the same passion for diving. >> >>The only reason you might hear of me is that I'm a recreational >>instructor, I occasionally post on some of the lists when I have >>something to say or can answer someone's question, and I've even traded a >>couple of emails with you over the years. >> >>Regarding newbie questions, people have to learn somehow. You can >>chuckle about the questions being unnecessary, maybe even silly, but >>sometimes it takes time to gain that perspective. I still believe the >>only dumb question is the one that remains unasked. >> >>This list and the others out there, are a way to share information, have >>questions answered, and to help pass along ideas that can make us all >>safer while we have fun underwater. I think most of the people here >>appreciate when those purposes of the list occur, and get a little tired >>when things stray off-topic for too long. >> >>Jan >> >>In a message dated 2/14/2003 10:03:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, >>captjt@mi*.co* writes: >> >>>Almost every diver who actually does the kind of dives that >>>represent what technical diving is, has already been heard of. >> >> >> >> >>------------------ >>Visit my web site with underwater and other photos at >>http:\\members.aol.com\jsuw3\index.html > > >"You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in >the water" >Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more > Web Site http://www.capt-jt.com/ >Email captjt@mi*.co* > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online >http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. "You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in the water" Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more Web Site http://www.capt-jt.com/ Email captjt@mi*.co* -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]