Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:26:38 -0500
Subject: Re: worthiness (was: scooters)
From: Joel Markwell <joeldm@mi*.co*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
As is usual with you, you get nothing right. I'm no wannabee. I have no 
aspirations in diving except to be a good diver. Therefore, I have no 
need or desire to compare myself to someone like you whose primary 
purpose here appears to be self-promotion, scatter-shot insults and 
reckless and macho diving pursuits.

I keep making the mistake of treating you like a mature person when by 
every indication you're an overgrown child who lashes out at everyone 
when he doesn't get his way.

That you are by your own admission, not a diver of any note, yet keep 
talking as if you are a diver of some repute (meaning some 
accomplishment), makes you just another dive-boat braggart. That 
appears to be your forte.

You don't get it, you'll never get it, the cows will get it before you 
do . . . .

JoeL

On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 03:33 PM, Capt JT wrote:

> Hi Joel, I knew you would be coming out soon, your ego has never 
> recovered from when I exposed you last on these list and you clearly 
> hope to get me back some day. Pulling the WKPP or GUE into it to stir 
> the pot will do no good for your cause.
> As I stated to Jan, I respect newbie question until they are meant to 
> defame or kiss someones ass, you have asked a question and it clearly 
> shows that it is meant to kiss Georges ass and try to defame me at the 
> same time. Though I have exposed you in the past, you are not a newbie 
> to diving, but just a wannabee.
> George only does extreme in a cave, he has claimed to dive to 400ft 
> but I cannot find any proof to support this, so his record for 
> cavediving has no bearing on what I do.
> Now for the deep dives he always uses the BIG Dive JJ/GUE did on the 
> Britannic, I was the one who exposed the cover up of the diver who got 
> the shit bent out of him. Though George would have you think that it 
> was some dumbass support diver (I do not dispute the dumbass part) the 
> support divers on that trip were tasked to dive to 160ft.....which 
> means he should have been trained for trimix, if not, was he doing 
> deep air?
> Now as I recall not long ago a GUE instructor and his buddy attempted 
> a dive to 500ft on a RB, in a cave or something close to it. This 
> resulted in a serious case of the bends for both divers I 
> heard......thus someone had problems do you not agree.
> Now I know many of you will now jump at the chance to say my 490ft was 
> a sand dive. Neither Rick nor I had any problems on the dive, we were 
> doing a dive that was extreme for many reasons, the depth was just one 
> part. The only problem we had was with a Halcyon lift bag that would 
> not work correctly. I was blamed for sending it up from to deep, later 
> it was found to be defective....... George made a big deal over the 
> tape of the dive that an illegal copy was made from and I am making it 
> available for others to see as I had promised at the time . The only 
> thing wrong on the tape was the guy who made it spelled planning 
> wrong, it was not me and I had it corrected on the DVD.
> Now to my knowledge I do not hold any records, other than putting up 
> with your kind on this list for so long. Do not put words in my 
> mouth.......

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]