Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:06:30 -0400
Subject: Re: solo diver cert
From: Joel Markwell <joeldm@mi*.co*>
To: Hugh Moore <hughmoore@bi*.co*>, Techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
On 8/9/02 6:57 AM, "Hugh Moore" <hughmoore@bi*.co*> wrote:

> Whats the problem, when I lived in Papua New Guinea, I did hundreds of solo
> dives off liveaboards/PNG Dive boats with my Camera. Crystal clear water,
> mostly less than 20 metres, photographing & filming the marine life.
> 
> In the mid nineties, operators requested that solo divers (read
> photographers) carry a Pony bottle in case while concentrating
> filming/photographing, ran out of air.
> 
> Most photographers would spend hours under/near the boat getting that
> perfect shot. You didnt have to go far!
> 
> I havent come accross many "BUDDYS" willing to sit under the boat in ten
> metres of water for an hour and half while you shoot off a role of film on a
> unique creature.
> 
> Maybe its OK with you, but havent seen it too often.
> 
> So Im a stroke, stiff shit, I dont need a baby sitter to reef dive with my
> Camera. I wore a pony for years, never used it once, didnt see a need for
> doubles either for the depths we were doing.  Never ran out of air once,
> after 90 mins, you are either out of film or battery was flat on the video.
> Its not hard to look at the gauge. I dont need a buddy to tap me on the
> shoulder every five minutes to check my air!
> 
> When doing a wreck/diving deep, you would dive as a group/with a buddy.
> 
> Hugh, South OZ

I've run into this mentality for years. I do UW photography too and have
spent hours just watching and the funny thing is, I've never had a problem
finding a buddy who wants to spend long periods of time underwater. Not
everyone needs to be cruising the reef as fast as possible, ignoring the
small stuff, not really paying attention as they cruise by, faster, deeper,
more macho. Maybe it's a Southern thang . . . .

And as for your "safety" record, I'm pretty sure that every one of those
solo divers who died while alone, before that final dive, would have touted
their record of a string of "safe" solo dives.

It's simple math. Two brains and two sets of eyes are almost always are
better than one. When you read the accident reports that are available (and
too few are) it's not hard to figure out that in nearly every intentional
solo, eventual solo and unintended solo dive, the addition of a buddy would
have increased the chances of survival immensely.

> I havent come accross many "BUDDYS" willing to sit under the boat in ten
> metres of water for an hour and half while you shoot off a role of film on a
> unique creature.

I'd get a new set of friends/buddys. I'm trying to picture guys/gals who'd
say, "spend hours underwater with you examining a beautiful reef in close
detail? You gotta be balmy!"

JoeL

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]