Interestingly this topic was recently discussed on another diving forum. A reply was posted by a hyperbaric specialist which sums up the current state of this research. Since his reply was posted on an open forum I am assuming (hopefully) that he would not mind me reposting his reply here. I think his comments put this issue into perspective. QUOTE: "I was one of the subjects in one phase of the study which was conducted at one of the SPUMS Scientific Meetings in Fiji recently. The media have over-hyped the significance of the results to some degree. Mike never suggested he had perfected a new diagnostic test for DCI. His study does confirm that divers who have performed dives in the sea (as opposed to hyperbaric chambers) do have more bubbles in the tear film of the eye than subjects who have not been diving. Moreover, this increase in bubble numbers tends to be more pronounced in those with actual symptoms of DCI. Unfortunately, the counts do not separate non divers, well divers and bent divers into discrete groups. There is considerable overlap. It follows that bubble counts are unlikely to ever replace interpretation of the presenting symptoms and signs as the most important diagnostic tool. It is possible that with more work it may be possible to develop guidelines about the probability of DCI based on tear film bubble counts, but we are still a way off this yet. The reference for Mike's study is: Bennett MH, Doolette DJ, Heffernan N. Ocular tear film bubble counts after recreational compressed air diving. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 2001;28(1):1-7." UNQUOTE -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]