You could point out to him that it invalidates his DAN insurance, if he has it: Posted on Quest today: "this insurance does not cover accidents arising from: . . . intentional exposure to partial oxygen pressures greater than 2 atm". > -----Original Message----- > From: Kongable, Richard [mailto:Richard_Kongable@bm*.co*] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:51 AM > > EAN40 at 160'? Wow! That's unusual, isn't it? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rod Linn [mailto:diverod@ms*.co*] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 3603 6:48 PM > > On this list I have read references to a chess playing study > done where one > participant was in a chamber and the other was outside the > chamber. Can > anyone tell me where I can find a paper on this or at least more > information. > > > > I have a friend that just completed an extended range deep > air course where > he was taught that "with training" you can learn to overcome > Narcosis and > it's effect on task loading. He made repetitive dives to 200 > feet on air > using independent doubles an switching to EAN40 at 160 fet for an > ascent/deco gas. He truly belives that he is one of the lucky > ones that > doesn't get narcosis. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]