>Thanks for bring this up Mike, it makes me wonder about this....... Wasn't >that a NOAA "sponsored dive"? a NOAA diver that was hurt? if it was it >doesn't sound like it was a recreational dive to me, or was this one of >those gray areas that is just OK when you do it. > For it to be a NOAA-sponsored dive, you would need to draft a research plan that has to be reviewed for authorization by the NDP Safety Board. A NOAA-authorized technical dive has numerous requirements. In contrast, this was a recreational dive where each and every person payed a charter fee. For me, being a NOAA working diver, it was a non-duty dive. No grey area. If you are interested in learning more about the NOAA Dive Program, please feel free to call the Seattle office. They can bring you up to speed. FWIW, the NOAA funded, NURC dives are in March. what else ya got chief? _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]