JT, it is pretty obvious that bondage wings are complete nonsense, and Doug
Chapman and others have covered a lot of the reasons why. I do not know why
you have to defend idiocy that you yourself do not believe in, and then do
so with a malpropic, nonsensensical  , illiterate stream of consciousness
from an obvious moron. There are not may people stupid enough to have
written that, so I will personally bet it  was Mouth.

The fact is that the video ( which the dive shop owner tried to destroy but
one of his disgruntled employees copied it and gave it to the lawyers),
showed that the guy could not control his buoyancy. However, who knows if it
was the bondage wings, the "steal" ( what a moron) tanks with the wetsuit,
or just that fact that the guy had no business doing the dive in the first
place.

Maybe you should ask mouth about the guy who died in the rock quarry in PA
by jumping in with "steal" stages and bondage wings, and could not get them
to hold enough gas due to the bungees triggering the OPV. Maybe you should
ask me about when I tried to lift Jane Ornstean from the ocean floor with
her bondage wings and the same things happened.

Chapman just said he got asked to test the wings in that case, he made no
other comments about the situation. Notice that whoever wrote that slop was
so happy about only paying 450 grand. No mention of the three dead, the wife
of the cop who died and could not collect insurance due to no body and could
not pay her bills (
until I had to go to court as an expert witness to why he was dead), or the
family of the guy from New York who died in that dive, and IANTD "class".

I think two things are clear here from your post: 1) whoever wrote that is
an illiterate moron, and 2) whoever wrote this is an unscrupulous scum bag
of the lowest order. The fact is that nothing about what happened that day
has been corrected, and nothing about what happened to Jane Ornstein has
been corrected.

Aligning your self with known assholes and scumbags is not making you look
too good, especially when none of that has anything to do with the topic at
hand, and none of it has anything to do with how you practice this sport or
with what you know to be correct.

The rest of that thing is a complete fabrication, with none of the facts
that need to be told about that accident. I did 23 dives at my own cost on
weekends when I could have been doing something a lot more fun and took the
two per day , back to back 250 foot drift dives offshore in howling current
and bad weather to try to find those guys. I had to go to court and see the
cop's wife crying face. You are wrong here for perpetuating mouth's lies and
dangerous stupidity. Mount is scum, and he has proven it over and over. Let
the asshole make his own posts to this list and I will rip him to pieces
with what was wrong there and continues to be wrong in his organization.
Anyone can take OMS apart - you don't have to be much more than a Downes
Syndrome case to see through that crap


-----Original Message-----
From: Capt JT [mailto:captjt@mi*.co*]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:08 PM
To: dougch@ea*.ne*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Bondage wings inflation.


Doug
The lawsuit you refer to, was it the WPB 3 accident in FL . If so can you
confirm the statement below that was emailed to me in private about the
court case. How accurate is the info below.

 >The triple death in WPB well the instructor is an or was an excellent
instructor and unlike what xxxxx states he did not smoke and he was not a
drunk. He was a retired sgt Major from SP and had 4 tours of duty in Nam
He went through swim school with the USN in February. He ran the US Army
swim Scholl for a few years.
He swim 2 miles 3 times a week up until the day he died and he ran for 20
minutes on the non swimming days .That comes from years of combat swims
He was an excellent diver and an excellent instructor.
xx was the expert witness against him or his estate the testimony is
interesting. Unfortunately the insurance company settled for 450,00 instead
of going to court as there is no doubt in the lawyers mind and evidently in
their that the case would have been beaten.xxxxxx per se had been dropped
out of the case 3 months earlier and the suit then was against xxxx estate,
xxxxxxxxxxxxx, The boat Captain and the diver who tried to assist in the
rescue until xxxxx sent him up because he was low on gas. . The suit had
been for 9 million originally. The offer for 450,00 was made as that was
the amount the insurance company figured they would spend in appeals once
the plaintiffs lost the case. And that offer was put on the table at
mediation called for by the plaintiffs attorneys the day before the case.
The attorney at hat time had only offered them 50 thousand (basically the
cost of a trial) So at 4 PM the offer was made and it was to be taken off
the table at 8:30 PM at 7:50 xxxxx called and they took it.
They then went to court against the diver (xxxxxxxx) who survived with xx
testifying against him. Had they won this case that would have meant
whatever you do do not try and rescue a diver. Fortunately the jury found
that xxxxxxx efforts only helped the situation not contribute to it as xx
was implying. Then the judge threw out the suit in regard to xxxxxxx the
3rd diver who died. xxxxxx was a close friend of xxxx but when they had a
problem he had left and went up to deco on his lift bag. The last time
xxxxxx saw him he was on his lift bag. He may have gone back down to assist
or he may have had a problem of his own. He was not a student or anything
that nature. He had not been with them on the three times they got up to
150 and then sank back to 200 plus before xxxxx left.
As far as config there was a complete video of xxxxx xxxxxx taking the same
equipment that was used by the deceased and ascending just using his BC.
Then they have a scene with xxxxx ascending with four steal stages just to
show that the BC would lift that much more.
Now I understand that they are making an appeal against the boat captain
because he has no insurance so will not have a lawyer to represent him. No
they will not get any real money but they can set a example they could use
in future cases against boat captains in similar situations. or any
accidents for that matter.
Thought you might want to know more about what happened than what is stated
on tech diver

END OF EMAIL

At 07:26 PM 12/18/01 -0500, Doug Chapman wrote:
>It is possible to orally inflate bondage wings at depth. I participated in
>gathering evidence for a lawsuit that involved bondage wings where the
>plaintiff claimed it was not possible to orally inflate the wings and get
>sufficient buoyancy to become positive. So we took the dead man's gear, a
>wetsuit, 15 or 20lbs of extra weight, two stages (if I recall I believe one
>was steel), and an extra steel 72 stage which I carried and passd to the
>diver at depth and went on a 230ft dive in freshwater (the fatality
occurred
>in seawater which would have been even more buoyant).
>
>We documented on video at depth that the diver could achieve buoyancy using
>the power inflator and that after the wings were completely dumped they
could
>be orally inflated to achieve positive buoyancy (several times). The
>demonstration proved the claim that the particular BC in question could not
>provide the lift was false. End of my involvement (as a safety diver during
>the exercise).
>
>Now if anyone would ask me if I would recommend a bondage type wing I would
>immediately say no. I tell people to cut off the cords on the wings they
have
>but that still doesn't get rid of the baloon size some of these wings are
>(e.g. 100# of lift). As mentioned by several people on this list, the
bungeed
>(bungled?) wings are not desirable IMHO because:
>
>1) The ability to precisely control venting is compromised by the positive
>overpressure in the wing created by the elastic cords. The pressure
anywhere
>in a submerged air bubble (the bladder in your BC) is equal to the
>hydrostatic pressure at the lowest (deepest) point on the bladder minus the
>weight of the air to the point in the bladder in question. This small
>pressure offset created by hydrostatic pressure is more than sufficient to
>properly vent a BC, with a degree of fine control.
>
>2) A puncture in the wing may be catastropic as the cords tend to
completely
>squeeze the wing in size.  in a BC that has no bungees, an air bubble can
be
>trapped within the wing and still offer flotation.
>
>3) The bungeed wings are typically monsterous in size and the drag created
by
>the crumpled mess can be prohibitive.
>
>4) The location of a bungeed wing (maybe unless it is fully inflated), on a
>horizontal diver, causes the center of buoyancy of the diver (with tanks)
to
>be farther below the center of gravity of the diver (with tanks) and
>therefore the stability of the diver is reduced. Note if you observe
>non-bungeed wings you will notice the two wing tips will be alongside the
>tanks. This is where the bulk of your nominal "in-flight" buoyancy should
be
>from a stability viewpoint. If you are weighted properly this volume will
be
>minimized offering sufficient reserve buoyancy if needed.
>
>5) I've had people tell me you need 100#s of lift in a BC in the event your
>buddy loses buoyancy and needs help - therefore you should use bungees to
>consolidate the large wing. To that I say bullshit. Of course you and your
>partner should be weighted correctly.
>
>Yes you can inflate a bungeed wing orally and you can get sufficient
buoyancy
>in most cases, but the negatives far outweigh and perceived advantages
(which
>I can't think of) so why bother with something inferior?
>
>Think Occum's razor!!!
>
>
>IMHO,
>Doug
>
>
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

"You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in the
water"

Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more
  Web Site  http://www.capt-jt.com/
Email     captjt@mi*.co*


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]