Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Brandon C. SCHWARTZ" <BCSDive@ms*.co*>
To: "Udo" <udo@hy*.or*>
Cc: "Quest List" <quest@gu*.co*>, "Techdiver List" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Bondage Wings Inflation?!?
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:57:42 -0500

------=_NextPart_001_000C_01C187BB.32CE4EA0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Udo,
One big problem is trying to keep ANY gas whatsoever in them in the event=
 a hole is popped, punctured, corrugated inflator detaches, etc. It is im=
possible with bungeed wings. Without bungees, lift can still be achieved =
by proper positioning of gas in wings, regardless of location of breech. =20
 =20
----- Original Message -----
From: Udo
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:48 AM
Cc: Quest List; Techdiver List
Subject: Re: Bondage Wings Inflation?!?
 =20
Sean;

Don't get me wrong... I am against those wings for all the reasons I am a=
ware of. I was merely hoping to give the proponents something to think ab=
out.

Udo


"Sean T. Stevenson" wrote:

> Udo, the physics do not change with depth.  The only thing that would m=
ake it more difficult to inflate at depth are the flow dynamics due to in=
creased density.  While it is possible to inflate these
> things, you are fighting the tension in the bungees to do so, introduci=
ng a lung loading which is probably not smart.  You know the feeling you =
get when you blow up a balloon?  While probably not
> as strong, the bungeed wing presents the same problem.  Besides, these =
things have so many other problems that this conversation is "mute"... ;-=
)
>
> -Sean


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co*
For additional commands, e-mail: quest-help@gu*.co*

------=_NextPart_001_000C_01C187BB.32CE4EA0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana;
border:none;"><DIV>Udo,</DIV> <DI=
V>One big problem is trying to keep ANY gas whatsoever in them in th=
e event a hole is popped, punctured, corrugated inflator detaches, e=
tc. It is impossible with bungeed wings. Without bungees, lift can s=
till be achieved by proper positioning of gas in wings, regardless of loc=
ation of breech. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE
style=3D"PADDI=
NG-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 =
2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Orig=
inal Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Ar=
ial; COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> Udo</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt
Arial"=
><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:48 AM</DIV> <DIV
style=3D"FON=
T: 10pt Arial"><B>Cc:</B> Quest List; Techdiver List</DIV> <DIV
style=3D"=
FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Bondage Wings Inflation?!?</DIV>
<D=
IV> </DIV>Sean;<BR><BR>Don't get me wrong... I am against those
wing=
s for all the reasons I am aware of. I was merely hoping to give the prop=
onents something to think about.<BR><BR>Udo<BR><BR><BR>"Sean T.
Stevenson=
" wrote:<BR><BR>> Udo, the physics do not change with depth.  The=
 only thing that would make it more difficult to inflate at depth are the=
 flow dynamics due to increased density.  While it is possible to in=
flate these<BR>> things, you are fighting the tension in the bungees t=
o do so, introducing a lung loading which is probably not smart.  Yo=
u know the feeling you get when you blow up a balloon?  While probab=
ly not<BR>> as strong, the bungeed wing presents the same problem.&nbs=
p; Besides, these things have so many other problems that this conversati=
on is "mute"... ;-)<BR>><BR>>
-Sean<BR><BR><BR>--------------------=
-------------------------------------------------<BR>To unsubscribe, e-ma=
il: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co*<BR>For additional commands, e-mail: quest-h=
elp@gu*.co*<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_001_000C_01C187BB.32CE4EA0--
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]