Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve Schultz <se2schul@bl*.ma*.uw*.ca*>
To: TASAZ@ao*.co*
cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re:Tanks

I'm strong enough and still dive 104's.  104's hold a lot of gas, even for "
general rec diving about 140 ft" and deeper.  You might have trouble managing
121's on a tossing boat.  Smaller tanks are just more enjoyable to dive... but
then again, so is a little helium on those " general rec diving about 140 ft"

ss 

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Paul Braunbehrens wrote:

> 121 weighs more.  If you are strong enough, get the 121.
> 
> TASAZ@ao*.co* wrote:
> ~
> >Would you rather use a 104 cu ft or 121 cu ft, pressed steel tank. 
> >low pressure tank
> >For general rec diving about 140 ft.
> >Dive shop says to use 104's, I get more cu ft for the same price if 
> >I get 121 cu ft.
> >Am I missing something?
> >Thanks in advance
> >Tim-Rec
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul B.
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> 

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]