Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Hi Mike Regardless of the negative emails you will receive over this post, you are doing the correct thing. Only by doing this can you get the proper facts out for those who are just getting into this type of diving to see how easy it is for things to go bad. I have studied all the accidents I could get the facts on, even though you claim to be diving solo, you were in my mind a buddy team when the separation took place and Eric lost. I have pondered the fate of Eric and were it went wrong. I would like to discuss it at a later time when things cool down. We can do it on one of the friendly list instead of Techdiver if you wish and leave them off. good luck JT At 08:38 AM 9/18/01 -0400, MICHAELPIZZIO@cs*.co* wrote: >Fellow Divers, > >I am writing to report to you the facts that I have concerning the loss of >Eric Reichardt on Sunday, 9/16. Some have voiced concern that nothing was >reported in the paper and no information was available concerning this tragic >event. However, as was reported here, attempts to locate Eric with the >USCG, BSO, area dive boats, and the kind assistance of other boaters were >taken. > >I was the only diver who entered the water with Eric, and as such, I am the >only source of information concerning the events. Eric was fully certifed >on, and diving, a Cis Lunar MK5P Closed Circuit rebreather. I was diving an >AP Valves Buddy Inspiration Closed Circuit rebreather. We both had OC >bailout and deco gases available, as well as all other normally carried tech >gear. > >The dive was on the wrecks of the RB Johnson and Corey and Chris, depth >approximately 268 FSW. This was my first dive with Eric, who was self >employeed in collection of tropical fishes. He had recently dove this same >wreck on the Cis Lunar and had seen a desired species, and he was attempting >to capture it. I had planned to explore certain areas of the interior of the >Corey and Chris. > >We agreed to drift into the wreck and go about our separate plans once on the >wreck. We had both 25 minute planned bottom times, with total run times of >107 minutes and 121 minutes. Eric was likely to finish deco first, as the >Cis Lunar has onboard realtime deco capabilities. I was carrying a reel with >an enclosed bag inflated on the surface which I would tie into the wreck and >use to drift off of after the dive. Eric was to shoot his own bag from the >wreck. > >Current on the site was 1.5 knots south, visability was about 40 -45 ft. >Eric was carrying gear to contain the tropicals, which were positively >bouyant, thus slowing his desent. I watch him above me occasinally as we >drifted into the wreck. Entry time was 13:20. > >I hit the bottom at run time 1 minute and put my depth guage in the sand to >get a bearing on the wreck location which was not in view. Depth was 268 >which meant that the wreck was slightly west of our location. I took a >compass bearing and swam at an angle westward, and looked up and saw Eric >about 30 ft above me and slightly behind me, next to my line. I did not see >him having any problems at this time. > >Decent time is a busy time for rebreather divers. In addition to normal >descent procedures, a rebreather diver has to monitor his PO2 readings, add >diluent to the counterlungs, change from low set point to high set point, >etc. Suffice to say, it is a high task loading period. > >Shortly after beginning to head west, I caught a view of the stern of the >wreck and swam hard for it, as the current was fairly strong. I got up to >the deck of the wreck, moved to the leeward side to tie in so as not to chafe >the line on the superstructure. I viewed my PO2 and systems, and noted a run >time of 3 minutes. > >I then went back to the other side of the wreck to see where Eric was. I did >not see him, so I swam the wreck to the point of contact with the RBJ in >search of him. Though the visability was poor by Florida standards, his >large yellow rebreather would have been relatively easy to spot. > >I began to consider what could have happened. My thoughts were that one of >three things were possible. 1. Eric missed the wreck, surfaced for another >drop, or continued a "dirt dive" out of my sight. 2. Eric saw a fish he >wanted, and went after it, as that was his goal. 3. He had a problem on the >dive. > >I acted in a worst case scenario and began a full bottom search for him. I >began by backtracking to the area I had last seen him, with a difficult swim >against the current. I then attempted to search other areas of the wrecks >that were previously out of my view. As the wrecks are 226' and 180' this is >a large search area with this visability. > >At run time 16 minutes, I decided that he was not on the wreck, at least to >the best of my abilities in the search. I believed that it was best for me >to begin an ascent for a number of reasons, and cut my deco obligation, in >case he was injured on the surface. > >I sent up a second lift bag to notify the surface there was a possible >problem. I completed my deco and surfaced to find that Eric was not on the >boat. > >We immediately contacted the boats in the area, told them the situation, and >began looking for a lift bag. We contacted the USCG and advised them of the >overdue diver, and were offered assistance by boats too numerous to mention >here. My sincere thanks for all who tried. > >We identifed the areas where Eric might surface based on current and run >time. A full search effort was underway to include air support. I requested >permission from the USCG to do a SAR dive in the area where I felt Eric might >be. They were understandably hesitant to agree, but contacted superiors for >permission. I agreed to their terms as it was their scene at this time. > >At approximatley 18:50 the USCG stated they did not want me to dive, but >reversed that decision shortly thereafter. With the sun low on the horizon, >poor vis and low ambient light, I decided the dive would be fruitless. There >were other factors, including support, stack time on the breather, diluent >gas, etc. I decide to try the next morning. > >I and a team of OC divers assembled this morning to attempt to recover Eric. >Dive conditions were very poor. Current at the site was 3.3 knots south, and >another dive boat reported 20 ft vis on the Miller Lite, a shallower but >nearby wreck. > >We will attempt again tomorrow. I will continue with this effort until it is >accomplished. >We have seen other tech diving fatalities, and the community has come >together to recover the victims. This is done mainly for the benefit of the >family, but also it is done for the dive community. It is what we should, >and will, do. > >I am sure that there are some who will second guess my actions on this dive >and I am amoung them. All I can say is that, though we were diving solo, I >did the best I could. Those of you that know me know that is is nothing I >would not have done in efforts to rescue Eric, or for that mattter, any >diver, had I been sucessful in locating him. > >My deepest condolences to Eric's family and friends, and my heartfelt thanks >to the many who have offered assistance and support. > >Regards, Mike >============================================================ >To contact the list administrator, email >Mike Rodriguez at mikey@mi*.ne* >To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a message to: >listserv@mi*.ne* >and in the *BODY* of the message type: >unsubscribe FLTechDiver "You can't learn to dive on the net, sooner or later you have to get in the water" Your Guide to Great Wreck Diving along the East Coast & more Web Site http://www.capt-jt.com/ Email captjt@mi*.co* -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]