Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: jheimann%scsd.dnet@gt*.co*
Subject: Re: PFO & Tables
From: <harvey::story@be*.es*.sg*.co*>
Cc: "techdiver@opal.com"%BUNNY.dnet@gte.com
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 93 22:51:45 -0400
jheimann%scsd.dnet@gt*.co* writes:
> 
> If this reasoning is sound, it could explain why tables based on maximum
> likelihood analysis show such spread for no-D times between risk categories
> (e.g., the Navy tables for 5% DCS risk allow MUCH longer no-D times than 1%
> risk).

This is interesting, but I think there are some definitional things
going on here, too.  According to the folks at NMRI, the definition of
"risk" they are using is not the same that you or I would normally
use.

That is, if we say "50% risk" that means that on any given dive, I
have a 1/2 chance of suffering DCI.  However, that is not the
definition they gave.  I'll have to dig it up, but it is most annoying
to have to redefine risk.

Cheers,

David Story                        NAUI AI Z9588, PADI DM 43922, EMT
story@be*.wp*.sg*.co*		  Every dive is a decompression dive.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]