> >Liz wrote: > >> ... since approx 25% of population >> has PFO there are divers with PFO who are >> asymptomatic. But those with PFO are at >> greater risk of DCS, embolic events and >> hypoxia. > >Why hypoxia? Hypoxia because some ofthe blood shunts back to the systemic circulation instead of going to the pulmonary system to be reoxygenated. > >> The researchers don't feel it >> is necessary to screen all divers before >> certification. Those with known PFO >> are advised to dive carefully (read, short >> and shallow) if they should dive at all. > >A series of tests were run in Scotland about a year ago (I think) where >volunteers submitted themselves for PFO testing. One of those found to >have a PFO was a diver. He was immediately banned from diving by SSAC. >He appealed on the basis that he had been diving for many years without >incident and the fact that his PFO was so small that they had only just >been able to detect it. In fact, they couldn't actually be sure it was >a PFO. I'm not sure about the current state of his appeal. > >Alan > Exactly the point I was making in the post. So many divers have the problem, now what is to be done since many don't know thye have PFO.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]