Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Don Burke" <donburke56@ne*.ne*>
To: "terry michael" <OEA51@go*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Split fins
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:42:40 -0400
If I want shit from you, I'll floss your teeth.

----- Original Message -----
From: terry michael <OEA51@go*.co*>
To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Sent: 06 August, 2001 11:38
Subject: Split fins


> Don, You may be lost the "Pampers" are over in the "baby" section along
with the "propeller" fins and other "baby" toys. Maybe you should find
yourself a good shower cap with a little fringe around the sides to critique
instead...:-) thanks
>
> ...............
>
> From: Joe Citelli <joe@po*.co*>
>
> > How could a fin with less surface area and rigidity possibly generate
more
> > thrust in the water than a fin with greater surface area and rigidity?
>
> If the smaller fin puts less water in the wrong direction, less surface
area
> is needed.
>
> If the flex in a fin causes more water to go straight back, the flex is a
> good thing.
>
> An extension of your argument is the use of a 4 by 8 sheet of plywood on
> each foot.  Since that doesn't seem to work very well, perhaps the
> hydrodynamic problem is a bit more involved than just surface area and
> rigidity.
>
> > People like them because they are easy to kick with.
>
> Perhaps
>
> >  But you travel less distance.
>
> That isn't how I interpret the test results I have seen.
>
> >  Personally, I'd rather kick hard once to cover a given distance
> > than kick easy three times.
>
> I doubt the ratio is that high.  In any case, isn't the figure of merit
gas
> consumption for distance traveled?
>
> > The manufacturers simply had nothing to sell so they made this up.
>
> Perhaps, although the test results do look encouraging.
>
> >  Funny how people that buy this kind of stuff typically keep going back
to
> the
> > stuff in their garage that works.
>
> I'm watching all of this.  They have my attention.  Perhaps one day
they'll
> get my money.
>
> The entanglement issue needs to be addressed.  I touch my line with a fin
at
> least once a dive and don't need anything else to wrap the line around.
>
> I saw a fin with vents down the center in one of the magazines and perhaps
> that is the wave of the future.
>
> The best performers seem to have the blade bent downward in a sort of
> "ballerina set."  It would not surprise me to find that much improvement
> comes from that.
>
> Don Burke
> Chesapeake, Virginia
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
> GO.com Mail
> Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com
>
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>


----------------------------------------------------
NetZero Platinum
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]