Hi Michael - Thanks for the opportunity to send some feedback on your magazine w/o having to pay the postage ;). I subscribed to AquaCorp last year when I called in to order a back issue (N7 "C2"). I had been following the rebreather conversation on Techdiver, and several people had referenced it. I really liked the C2 issue. The layout was good, content was excelent, and I felt like I'd come up to speed on most if not all of the important issues surrounding closed circuit in a very short time. I looked forward to the next issue. Then, within months, I got the Hard and Wreckers issues. Something had changed, and my guess is that it was really two things; someone bought some high power macs, and someone else connected them to the net. The layouts were even more impressive, and the editorial style started to take on a manic glee reminiscent of William Gibson. While I appreciate both of these forms, they don't appeal to the side of me that dives. That side tends to gravitate more to the stable, predictable and boring (ok, there, I said it) aspects of technology. Yes, there's a certain thrill factor in diving, but it's not the *point* of diving, it's a side effect. The point is to go there, do something, and come back to tell the story. I think technical diving adds the further aspect of describing in detail *how* you got there and came back. I could talk about the nipple and the pincer, but I think that topic has already been hammered into the ground. In a nutshell, less form, more content. Less razzle-dazzle, more science. Less machismo, more exploration. My $.02 Regards, Scott Cherf PS. While I'm an avid fan of computers and communications, and a regular user of the internet, these topics are better covered by other publications. I would encourage you to stick to what you do best.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]