In a message dated 7/8/01 10:53:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cobber@ci*.co* writes: > Sorry, Bob, yes these are rationalizations but not one single reason that a > single with H is better than a set of doubles. You asked for rationales, you got em. You want reasons too, here you go: 1) Smaller profile 2) Reduced weight 3) Decreased drag 4) Readily available 5) Reduced space requirements 6) KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid >You can't do it, get over it. You can't understand it, don't bother to try. >If you think you need an H valve than what you really need are doubles. If >you don't think you need doubles than you don't need an H valve. If you're diving doubles for dives that only require a single, you're doing it wrong. If you're diving a single with a K-valve, you'd be better off with an H-valve. Here you go Jim, go argue with JJ and the crew at GUE, I'm starting to get bored. http://www.gue.com/./equipment/valves.shtml http://www.gue.com/./equipment/equip-anatomy2.shtml Bob Decker www.SportDiverHQ.com -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]