Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Do you have a boilerplate or link to definitions of Grade 1,2,3,4 ? Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trey" <trey@ne*.co*> To: "Scott" <scottk@nw*.co*>; "Techlist" <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:55 AM Subject: RE: accident > > Scott, we have checked with Doppler for some number of years. The two things > that we get from this are 1) if the deco produced a low count, and 2) how > long it takes us to peak in bubbles and clear. We run several teams on > similar profiles and then we followed slightly different protocols and then > started the Doppler testing as soon as the divers surfaced and every half > hour afterwards. In on case, we had Rose do it right and everyone else from > Trout to JJ do it almost right, and I just blew straight to the surface from > the 30 foot stop. Now it got interesting: Rose showed almost no bubbles at > all - grade 1 at most. The others showed some increase on that all the way > up to me who showed grade 4. Dr Johansen said I should "go to the chamber". > When I stopped laughing, he tested me again - nothing , not even grade one, > and that being only 1/2 hour later. This is just one example, but over time > what we found was that our standard methods as seen on our website are > perfect, and the guys in the best shape as measured by VO2 max clear the > fastest. > > The other tests we ran were the standard neurologicals and evaluation by > Navy professionals ( who are on the team ) and we draw blood before and > after looking for markers of damage. We do the blood on me and JJ - so far > nothing. Scott Hunsucker is in charge of this area of our research. > > By the way, it is so funny to listen to the morons try to tell us about > deco. The rebreather idiots keep yelling "constant ppo2" , the weenies keep > doing massive decoes, and the real idiots ( IANTD types ) use the wrong > gasses. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott [mailto:scottk@nw*.co*] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:55 AM > To: Techlist; Trey > Subject: Re: accident > > > How much of a role did Doppler Stethoscopes play in your research? > > I know you guys worked with Hamilton and Mee, but how about a little of the > nuts and bolts of your development > protocol? > > Scott > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Trey" <trey@ne*.co*> > To: <Art.Paltz@R2*.CO*>; <decoweenie@ya*.co*>; <george.morris@ci*.co*>; > <adamjma@op*.ne*> > Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 5:49 PM > Subject: RE: accident > > > > Some is pretty close, but the upper intermediate steps in RGBM are too > long > > and do not take advantage of some of my other tricks. For instance, I can > to > > 6 hours at 300 and the total deco is 8, and the 40 foot stop is 20 > minutes. > > RGBM will have that 40 stop out to the moon. I pressed that one a while > > back in an experiment, figuring I could go back and redeco if I got hit, > and > > it worked . There are a bunch of other differences as well. We do some > > pretty radical stuff, but when then it works better than anything anyone > has > > ever come up with. > > > > > > > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]