Ed Street schrieb: > I've been looking at the DIR setup for awhile Ed, What about _diving_ it for a while, then make up your mind ? > a) it goes against the majority of diving standards known today. Could you pls define any of those standards ? What do you call a standard ? diving an alternate air source from the same first stage ? Like how > many total training facilities in the U.S. (yea I'm in the u.s. and don't > give a flip about non-us stuff here) teaches this concept vs. the total > number of facilities that teaches other theories? Again, what do you call a "theory" in teaching diving ? I believe the most found "theory" is reducing standards ( that is for me, the criteria of meeting specific performance) to the the least common denominator. Everybody should be able to comply to those standards, and leave their money, right? > One way of looking at this is evolution didn't just > happen, it was a slow gradual step by step and update by update over a long > period of time. No, it is rec market marketing at its best ( worst). Evolution is what they make you believe you have bought. What changes/update/revisions has the DIR system undergone? Define the criteria of need to undergo changes, pls. > > c) Most dive outfits doesn't support the dir layout. Why is this? Because they want you to buy the next evolutionary step stuff. Is it > because that it's not that good? Is it because that there's to many people > turns up DEAD? Is it because of the above and below statements? rest dumped into the trollbox Matthias -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]