Terry Hmm, you lost me on that one. The basis of the question that we both = were responding to related to: >casual dives less than 40mtrs (no deco) My points related to understanding the dive and impact of overrunning = the plan. What I was suggesting was a significant amount of planning = forming the basis of education, resulting in contingency plans but also = an ability to place a bound on the deco should it be necessary. Have a good life. David Shimell -----Original Message----- From: terry michael [SMTP:OEA51@go*.co*] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:19 PM To: David Shimell; Bruce Sherman; Techdiver List Subject: Re: Re: Computor Shimell, If you don't have a dive plan and a back-up contingency then you don't = get in the water, not on my boat. I don't care who you think you are = (unless you're George). Also you don't plan a decompression dive without = gas and regulator redundancy!! that is a cardinal rule in my opinion. = You are dangerous to yourself and others in my view, so I'll stay clear! = -----Original Message----- From: "David Shimell"<David.Shimell@ta*.co*> To: "'terry michael'"<OEA51@go*.co*>, "Bruce = Sherman"<bruce.s@co*.co*.nz*>, "Techdiver List"<techdiver@aquanaut.com> Date: Thu May 24 09:33:25 PDT 2001 Subject: Re: Computor >Bruce > >You're probably asking this question on the wrong forum, since the = concept of "no-deco" dives is not really very techdiver What you may = wish to do is obtain some desk-top deco software and try out some = scenarios. Try what you may consider a no stop dive at 30m and add 10 = minutes extra bottom time. Is the deco significant? How does it change = if you go 20 minutes over the no stop time? > >How does this relate to the cylinders you carry? Can you do 20 minutes = over the no-stop time whilst maintaining sufficient reserve? If not, = then you have worked out an upper bound on your BT and the max deco to = do. If you dive single cylinders then you'll find that the max deco = you'll need to do is what we Brits call bugger all. > >Try the same scenario with Nitrox. > >Dive computers are currently pretty poor at working out deco since = their algorithm is maximised to avoid litigation. However, the reality = is that if you do dives close to the no stop zone, then there isn't too = much penalty in using them. The corollary is that there isn't really = much point in using them as a bottom timer will work just as well. When = you get into gradual ascents (multi-level) dives, it gets less straight = forward, but a little bit of common sense works here too. > >One of the key issues with dive computers is that people treat them is = a reverence that is inappropriate to their status. Ask yourself how = comfortable would you be to bail out on your tables if the computer = fails. If you claim comfort, then practice bail-out on every dive. Now = you'll find that you don't need a computer. However, if you are not = comfortable given a computer failure, then you shouldn't be using one in = the first place since it will fail. > >For the dives I do, I usually get out of the water 20-90 minutes before = those using mixed gas computers or even crazy tables. Surprisingly, = there is a lot you can learn on the PC, but for it to be meaningful, you = have to put it into practice by diving. > >Finally, I would caution you about listening to people that have a = universal table that's always clipped off in their slate pocket (right = thigh). Although they may be doing the dives you do, it is likely that = their experience is limited. > >David Shimell > >-----Original Message----- >From: terry michael [SMTP:OEA51@go*.co*] >Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 6:44 PM >To: Bruce Sherman; Techdiver List >Subject: Re: Computor > >Bruce, It's all lip service in my opinion, most of the ones with the = decompression software doing big dives on the computer at home, actually = show up at the site for the "pussy dives" with no tables and a computer = and some with just a BT. Next time you're in the water doing a buddy = check call BU tables and see for yourself. As for me I dive the = Buehlmann table and it's always clipped off in my slate pocket (right = thigh). In order to forget it I'd have to forget my drysuit..:-) > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Bruce Sherman"<bruce.s@co*.co*.nz*> >To: "Techdiver List"<techdiver@aquanaut.com> >Date: Mon May 21 15:21:15 PDT 2001 >Subject: Computor's on dives to max 40mtrs - OK or Laziness ??? > >>Ok, quick question. Each dive I do or have ever done, in any = circumstance. Is done using a Uwatec bottom timer and tables (PADI wheel = for dives less than 40mtrs with no deco) ( Stop Laughing this is a = serious question) as I thought this was DIR.=20 >> >>However I get the feeling that on lots or recreational dives, lots of = people who dive DIR, use computors due to convienence. And I must admitt = it would be more simples to use one, BUT I'm quite quick using the wheel = (stop laughing) to calculate bottom times so there isn't really an = inconvienence. >> >>SO my question is : Is DIR no computors for anything bar nothing ? and = if so what tables etc are people using to calculate bottom times on = casual dives less than 40mtrs (no deco)? or is using a computor on dives = less than 40mtrs with no deco within the DIR frame ?=20 >>Cheers >>Chaz > > >___________________________________________________ >GO.com Mail =20 >Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com > > >-- >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to = `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail =20 Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com =00 -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]