That's why we have a brain.

> I can sort of see Tom's point, not that its a great one.
> Suppose you plan your tables for a dive on a wreck
> at 180' but end up spending half your bottom time 
> swimming around the superstructure at 160' or so.  
> Following the tables would not account for the reduced
> deco time that the computer would be able to calculate
> on the fly.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]