Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0163_01C0E2BF.443663E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey - now that PADI are getting into Tek-Rec, maybe they'll come out with a Trimix version of the wheel. -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Sherman [mailto:bruce.s@co*.co*.nz*] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:21 PM To: Techdiver List Subject: Computor's on dives to max 40mtrs - OK or Laziness ??? Ok, quick question. Each dive I do or have ever done, in any circumstance. Is done using a Uwatec bottom timer and tables (PADI wheel for dives less than 40mtrs with no deco) ( Stop Laughing this is a serious question) as I thought this was DIR. However I get the feeling that on lots or recreational dives, lots of people who dive DIR, use computors due to convienence. And I must admitt it would be more simples to use one, BUT I'm quite quick using the wheel (stop laughing) to calculate bottom times so there isn't really an inconvienence. SO my question is : Is DIR no computors for anything bar nothing ? and if so what tables etc are people using to calculate bottom times on casual dives less than 40mtrs (no deco)? or is using a computor on dives less than 40mtrs with no deco within the DIR frame ? Cheers Chaz ------=_NextPart_000_0163_01C0E2BF.443663E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3211.1700" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#0000ff face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN = class=3D654385919-22052001>Hey -=20 now that PADI are getting into Tek-Rec, maybe they'll come out with a = Trimix=20 version of the wheel.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: = 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"> <DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr><FONT = face=3DTahoma=20 size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Bruce Sherman=20 [mailto:bruce.s@co*.co*.nz*]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, May 21, 2001 = 3:21=20 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Techdiver List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Computor's on dives = to max=20 40mtrs - OK or Laziness ???<BR><BR></DIV></FONT> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Ok, quick question. Each dive I do or have = ever done, in=20 any circumstance. Is done using a Uwatec bottom timer and tables (PADI = wheel=20 for dives less than 40mtrs with no deco) ( Stop Laughing this is a = serious=20 question) as I thought this was DIR. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>However I get the feeling that on lots or = recreational=20 dives, lots of people who dive DIR, use computors due to convienence. = And I=20 must admitt it would be more simples to use one, BUT I'm quite quick = using the=20 wheel (stop laughing) to calculate bottom times so there isn't really = an=20 inconvienence.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>SO my question is : Is DIR no computors for = anything bar=20 nothing ? and if so what tables etc are people using to calculate = bottom times=20 on casual dives less than 40mtrs (no deco)? or is using a computor on = dives=20 less than 40mtrs with no deco within the DIR frame ? </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Cheers</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Chaz</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0163_01C0E2BF.443663E0-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]