I stopped by the IANTD booth at a major East Coast dive show this weekend, and overheard something that made me glad I wasn't wearing a full face mask (I might have drowned on my lunch). An obvious new diver was talking excitedly with a bunch of guys with IANTD t-shirts (only one of whom I've ever seen on an actual deep dive). He was saying that he had signed up for a trimix course, because he wanted to dive the Texas Tower. The IANTD guys were encouraging him to do this. Now for those of you who don't dive the US North Atlantic, the Texas Tower is a radar station that sank off New Jersey in about 185 fsw. Although one can dig one's computers in the sandy washouts and get 200 fsw, the only reason to do this is to try to impress your novice friends. The wreck rises to 70 fsw, with the most interesting parts not exceeding 150 fsw. It is considered a standard destination for deep wreck divers, and a good deep training dive since it is easy to navigate and has outstanding visibility. I explained this to the new guy that this was really best done as an air dive, but he didn't really want to hear this. I guess going deep and being trimix certified was cool, and he wanted to pay his money and get his card. I later spoke with the IANTD guys, and suggested that maybe people who didn't have the experience to handle 130-150 fsw on air weren't ready to do trimix. They said that not everyone could do a 185 fsw dive on air - which just made me suspect they had never actually been there. The spiel they were giving sounded just like what PADI used to give its newly cerified open water students about why they should immediately enroll in "advanced" open water courses and get trained to go deeper. Fortunately, common sense has prevailed over profit with the recreational training agencies, and they now encourage their OW divers to get a little experience above 60 fsw before enrolling in AOW. Common sense appears not to have won out in IANTD. I know some IANTD instructors (some of whom read this list) whom I respect greatly as divers and instructors. I had very positive experiences when I did tech nitrox in '91, and trimix in '93, but it wasn't quite as big business then as now. When I see courses like the "Explorer" (combind crash course in Tech EAN, Trimix, Deep Air, Cave Diving, and Wreck Diving) or like "EAN Underwater Modelling" listed in Tom Mount's catalog, I start to worry about how seriously IANTD weighs its responsibility for safe training against its potential profits. John Heimannj@ma*.nd*.gt*.co*
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]