Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <tsnord@fo*.ne*>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:10:39 +0100
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: [Fwd: Fins question]
Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format.
--------------57EB25CF6B5F197C65BCB8C5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



--------------57EB25CF6B5F197C65BCB8C5
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <owner-techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Received: from fulton.opal.com (fulton.opal.com [198.3.124.1])
	by thor.komtel.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA09019
	for <tsnord@th*.ko*.ne*>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:18:11 +0100
Received: from fulton.opal.com (mail@lo*) 
	by fulton.opal.com (8.9.3/jr4.0) with EXEC for 
	id AAA14233; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:03:32 -0500
Received: (mail@lo*) 
	by fulton.opal.com (8.9.3/jr4.0) for 
	id AAA14230; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:03:32 -0500
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: owner-techdiver@aquanaut.com
Received: from fulton.opal.com (root@lo*) 
	by fulton.opal.com (8.9.3/jr4.0) with EXEC for techdiver
	id WAA11859; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:25:06 -0500
Received: from axis.scu.edu.au (wwwproxy.scu.edu.au [203.2.32.1]) 
	by fulton.opal.com (8.9.3/jr4.0) with ESMTP for <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
	id WAA11839; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:25:02 -0500
Received: from alsvid.scu.edu.au (alsvid.scu.edu.au [203.2.33.1])
	by axis.scu.edu.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1M3OqA19244;
	Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:24:52 +1100 (EST)
Received: from red_dwarf (s1h1p05.scu.edu.au [203.2.40.25])
	by alsvid.scu.edu.au (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id OAA27429;
	Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:24:51 +1100 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20010222141020.02454cc0@po*.sc*.ed*.au*>
X-Sender: shartley@po*.sc*.ed*.au*
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:10:20 +1000
To: Paul Braunbehrens <Bakalite@ba*.co*>
From: Simon L Hartley <shartley@sc*.ed*.au*>
Subject: Re: Fins question
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
In-Reply-To: <p0501040bb6b9c48f3090@[192.168.0.4]>
References: <3.0.1.32.20010213134348.02461dc0@po*.sc*.ed*.au*>
 <3.0.1.32.20010213134348.02461dc0@po*.sc*.ed*.au*>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Paul,

At 11:17 21/02/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Twin jets have the same strap as Jet's wich allow you to use spring 
>straps, available from fifthd.

Hmmm...  I didn't think that was the case but after a quick look at the web
site you may be right (was fairly sure I'd had a good look at the fins,
certainly other split fin designs).  I know the newer Sea Wings (I had some
old Sea Wing Gorilla's before I got my Jets) appeared to add the quick
release on to a standard mounting so I guess these could be fitted with
spring straps.  

Either way I wouldn't be spending the big bucks these fins cost without a
lot of justification (my jet fins cost around AUS$140, the twin jets are
over twice that at least (and my fins get a lot of abuse)).  The propeller
and whale tail examples are pretty meaningless to my way of thinking,
humans are neither boats nor cetaceans.  We're essentially land lubbers,
lacking the efficent hydrodynamic shape of fish and the specialisation in
skin, muscles and skeletal structure.  If you want to pick a fish that
might equate to a human pick something slow moving with (apparently) poor
hydrodynamics.  Maybe a pufferfish, their fins are paddle shaped.  I'm sure
that there are exceptions but slower moving reef fish have larger more
paddle like tails.  Fast moving pelargic fish have smaller, fork shaped
tails (to reduce drag).  The only time I can think of that fin drag is an
issue for humans is for body board riders where small (dove tail shaped)
fins are the norm.  

Having said that though I know bugger all really about hydrodynamics and
propulsion.  I'm not opposed to trying new things if the opportunity arises
(there was a pair of Bio Fins floating around the shop I had planned to
road test for interest) however even getting fins in the water for a little
while (in a pool) can be highly subjective.  I'd also be questioning a
fins, durability, range of fin strokes (so your not stuck with the same
finning motion but can vary the stroke for power, manuverability or comfort
(to reduce fatigue and share the load)) and other issues (like the
entanglement issue raised earlier).  I know from cycling too that I
personally tend to get along better with slow power strokes rather than
rapid peddling (in lower gears).  If this translates to fins some designs
certainly wouldn't suit me.

Cheers,

Simon

Simon L Hartley
RSM Website Coordinator\First Year Course Coordinator
Associate Lecturer
School of Resource Science and Management
Southern Cross University
P.O. Box 157
Lismore NSW, Australia 2480
Ph: (02) 66203251 or (61 66) 203 251
Fax:(02) 66212669
E-mail: shartley@sc*.ed*.au*

http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/rsm/staff/pages/shartley/

http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/rsm/
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--------------57EB25CF6B5F197C65BCB8C5--

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]