The story, as I got it, was that a tender opened a hatch that connected a diving bell to the surface chamber before the two had been properly sealed together. I've been trying to remember where I heard the story. As soon as I read my posting, I realized the logic error you point out in the way I wrote it originally. Sorry Wendell G John Cockburn wrote: > How on earth did he do that. All of the chambers that I have seen open in > the way so the pressure in the chanber holds the door closed and against > it's seal, 3 or 4 psig will hold the door well closed. The last time I was > in a chamber (for professional reasons!!) we tried to pull the door open at > 10 feet and two of us couldn't move it. > > John Cockburn, > Scotland. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Wendell Grogan <wgrogan@dc*.ne*> > To: <terry-1@ly*.co*> > Cc: Matthias Voss <mat.voss@t-*.de*>; Steven Bliim > <Steven.Bliim@Mc*.co*.au*>; Techdiver@Aquanaut.Com > <techdiver@aquanaut.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:35 PM > Subject: Re: re nitrogen elimination and oxygen > > > In addition to being cynical, I was also being ironic. In a sudden > chamber decompression, everyone inside dies and there is a high risk of > injury from shrapnel from anyone standing nearby. I haven't > > heard of this happening to a chamber recently, but there was a case not > too long ago of a tender opening a chamber door from the inside while it was > still pressurized- not a pretty sight. > > Wendell G > > > > Terry Michael wrote: > > > > > Does this pose any danger to the operator? > > > What about the tender? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 20:49:36 > > > Wendell Grogan wrote: > > > >As cynical as I am, I think the slightly less malignant explanation for > this is that a poorly maintained chamber is likely to blow out ("sudden > unplanned decompression") at more than 60fsw pressure > > > >(the max on 5). Since there might be a chamber attendant in or near > the chamber, they probably don't want to run that risk. > > > >Wendell G > > > > > > > >Terry Michael wrote: > > > > > > > >> Unfortunately you don't often have a choice. > > > >> I've heard that of some of the chambers (down in Mexico for example) > run for profit and will start you on a USNAVY 5 just to milk you for more > sessions.... I think they were affiliated with DAN. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:25:57 > > > >> Matthias Voss wrote: > > > >> >Wendell, > > > >> >if this is because of He, I wonder why. Perhaps because of the lower > > > >> >density of the mix, this gives less work of breathing, so less CO2 > > > >> >buildup , and perhaps a better ventilation, which in return helps > > > >> >harvest the benefits of the remaining oxygen. > > > >> >regards > > > >> >Matthias > > > >> > > > > >> >wgrogan@dc*.ne* schrieb: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Matthias- > > > >> >> I did not mean to suggest that higher pressures, especially at the > beginning > > > >> >> of treatment, might not be needed. > > > >> >> Rather, instead of using pure O2 at the 60 fsw level, this work > shows that recovery > > > >> >> is better when heliox is used. You still get the positive effects > of the increased > > > >> >> pressure on the bubbles, but without the negative effects of high > oxygen tensions > > > >> >> at those pressures. > > > >> >> Wendell > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >Wendell, > > > >> >> >the Kiel's Navy Chamber former Chief officer was reported saying > that he > > > >> >> >needed the extra pressure to crush down the organic matter > surrounding > > > >> >> >the bubbles. > > > >> >> >My aquaintance worked with him as an medical assistant . > > > >> >> >regards > > > >> >> >Matthias > > > >> >-- > > > >> >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > > > >> >Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to > `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> Get FREE Email/Voicemail with 15MB at Lycos Communications at > http://comm.lycos.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get FREE Email/Voicemail with 15MB at Lycos Communications at > http://comm.lycos.com > > > > -- > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]