Mike, add the important fact that you can not operate a pony in a fashion that follows the DIR rules of bottle marking and deployment, which I recently put out in a post on this topic. If one needs a paranoia bottle, one needs to carry a proper stage. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Rodriguez [mailto:mikey@ma*.co*] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:24 PM To: Paul Braunbehrens Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: Re: Pony's and deep air At 09:30 PM 10/16/2000 -0700, Paul Braunbehrens wrote: Hello Paul, >DIR is against the use of ponies, so you can leave that part out. >Exact reasons why would be welcome. - Ponies are an entanglement hazard. They're hard to see and hard or impossible to remove underwater in the event they get entangled. Also, they can "key" you into a restriction where being unable to remove it could cost you your life. - If you need more gas, it's likely due to one of the following: 1. High-drag gear configuration. In this case, consider streamlining your gear. 2. Out of shape diver. In this case, consider a gym membership. :) 3. Long bottom times. In this case, you're probably doing a planned decompression dive, and you should be diving manifolded doubles with full redundancy, not a pony. - If you want a pony in case you have an air failure, consider that: 1. If you have a downstream-design regulator (very likely) then the failure mode is a free-flow. Even with an all-out free-flow, it will take a long time to drain your tank; certainly enough time to get to the surface. Try it in the shallow end of a pool sometime. 2. You have (or should have) a buddy who can share air with you in the event you do manage to run out. >As far as deep air goes, what >constitutes "deep", This is a topic of much contention. My opinion is that anything beyond 100 feet or so is definitely deep enough to add helium. There are lots of reasons for this but I'll list a few off the top of my head. 1. When I go hunt lobster in 70 feet of water off the southeast Florida coast, I nearly always catch the limit when I'm on mix. Yes, even in 70 feet I breathe mix. When I do the same dive on air, I can't quite catch as many lobsters. I don't *notice* narcosis on air at 70 feet, but the lobster-count evidence is pretty hard to ignore. In an emergency, I want to have available whatever mental faculty allows me to catch more lobster. Diving mix gives me that. 2. I haven't dove air below 100 feet in a long time. My first-hand experience tells me what a bad idea this is and objective experiments (see below for references) confirms my experience. Narcosis adaptation by non-saturation divers is a *myth*. Adaptation does indeed appear to occur, but only after multi-day *continuous* exposure to high PN2. Itinerant divers can overlearn some skills to help compensate for narcosis to some extent, but an emergency requiring a new, non-overlearned skill (which emergencies have a tendency to be) can be a death sentence under high PN2. 3. High PN2 causes subtle, *irreversible* damage to the body. I'm not making this up or parroting others' opinions on this. This fact is documented (see below for references). >and some references to actual fatalities brought >on by deep air (and I'm not talking 400 feet here, but people who >kicked the bucket doing what a rec. diver might do on a deep air >dive). I'll leave this one to someone else. Too morbid for me to go off and put together a list for ya. References: Kiessling & Maag 1962, Performance Impairment As A Function Of Nitrogen Narcosis. Case & Haldane 1941, Human Physiology Under High Pressure. Bennett & Glass 1961, Electroencephalographic And Other Changes Induced By High Partial Pressures Of NItrogen. Fowler 1973, The Effect Of Hyperbaric Air On Short-Tem And Long-Term Memory. Kiessling & Maag 1962, Performance Impairment As A Function Of Nitrogen Narcosis. Frankenhaeuser 1963, Effects On Psychomotor Functions Of Different Nitrogen-Oxygen Gas Mixtures At Increased Ambient Pressures. Fowler 1973, The Effect Of Hyperbaric Air On Short-Tem And Long-Term Memory. Bennett, The Effects Of High Pressures Of Inert Gases On Auditory Evoked Potentials In Cat Cortex And Reticular Formation. Bennet 1963, Neurophysiologic ANd Neuropharmacologic Investigations In Inert Gas Narcosis. Bennet & Elliott 1993, The Physiology And Medicine Of Diving There are tons more. This is not a poorly researched field. -Mike Rodriguez <mikey@mi*.ne*> http://www.mikey.net/aue Pn(x) = (1/(2^n)n!)[d/dx]^n(x^2 - 1)^n -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]