Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: "Manos Manoli" <cytech@ma*.co*.cy*>
Cc: "Paul Braunbehrens" <Bakalite@ba*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Pony's and deep air
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:35:30 -0400
We had a guy down here who had a pony of 02 strapped behind his back along
with a completely sloppy doubles rig. He jumped down on the RBJ at 220 on
his 02 pony - DOA. I don't go out on boats where there is crap like that
going on. Tom Mount was on that dive, I think he retreived the body. His
solution? Poddle jackets. My solution - DIR or not at all.


-----Original Message-----
From: Manos Manoli [mailto:cytech@ma*.co*.cy*]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 8:41 AM
To: Trey
Cc: Paul Braunbehrens; techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Pony's and deep air


There is a guy recently Diving the Zenobia last week who jumped in to the
water
with a single tank and a pony. He wanted to call himself an instructor !
I like to referrer to  Pony Tanks as any kind of low volume Tank that divers
have the stupidity to stack between, or at the side of their tanks. I simply
cannot figure out why
most of them are yellow they should be black with a
skeleton head on them !!"

Apparently he jumped into the water with the pony tank
regulator in his mouth. That's what is happening when you don't know where
the
hose is coming from. And pls don't come back to me saying that marking the
reg.
helps because it doesn't ! After 10" he drained the pony and bold to the
surface
living his whole group behind.

If someone wants to have a spare tank for bailout or
deco it should be at the right place with the right marking.
Nobody needs to be a brain surgeon to figure out that.

I totally agree with G.

Manos Manoli.
Cytech Divers int.
Limassol - Cyprus




Trey wrote:

> Paul, to carry a bottle as a stage according to all out stage protocol and
> bottle marking rules is fine, but implies doing a dive  for which you are
> not geared correctly in the first place. True redundancy means a dual
outlet
> manifold with hoses configured DIR.
>
> To have a bottle strapped to your tanks is bullshit - none of the correct
> protocol can be applied. To have a pony and doubles is farm animal.
>
> Air is bullshit at any depth.
>
> Below is my gas mixing and bottle marking / deployment protocol.
>
> GAS MIXING LESS THE BS:
>
>  Let's assume all bottles are correctly marked - that means MOD only,
> horizontally, in three inch high letters , on either side of the upper
> bottle in the orientation of the tank. All tanks turned off, all regs
> parked. To deploy, we locate the bottle by MOD, we remove the reg and put
it
> in our mouth, we then relocate the bottle by MOD, and turn if on. If we
can
> breathe, we are breathing the right gas.
>
> Now, mixing. First put two pieces of tape or one GUE split tape on the
empty
> bottle. Hook up to either gas, but I do helium first since I want my
oxygen
> addition to be more in the middle of the operating range of the gauge, but
> it can be done either way. Figure the correct amount of helium for your
mix
> considering coefficient of expansion and heat expansion. Helium will need
> about 17% overfill to get the % you seek. Let's say we want 50% and we are
> filling to 3000. Fill the tank first to 1750 to get to half, but then add
> another 10% or so for heat expansion, so go to a total of 1900 roughly. It
> should cool back to 1750 or so. No sense getting real anal here, the heat
> expansion is simply equal to the ratio of absolute temperature change,
using
> the Kelvin scale - just guess at it. Turn the bottle off, but do not
remove
> the whip until you have written down the contents of the tank and the
date.
> Now remove the whip .
>
> Now, add the oxygen. Keep in mind that it will be heated and expanded, but
> not too badly. Go a little over your intended amount but not too much.
> Calculate this independently of the helium, and add it without regard for
> the "pressure" of the helium. If you added the oxygen fist, keep in mind
> that it will have expanded as well from the heat of the helium filling and
> be giving you a higher overall helium pressure reading than you really
have,
> so add a touch there if that is the case over and above the other two
> reasons. Do not remove the whip until you have written down  the new gas
> added and the date. Analyze it if you please, to solve for the helium
later
> to satisfy yourself.
>
> Now add the air, unless that was heliox and we are done. Immediately
analyze
> the gas and write the analysis on the other piece of tape or the split
tape,
> write the date on it as well,  and take the original tape off the tank and
> cover the valve with it to indicate that the tank is full. Do not move the
> tank until this is done. Obviously , the analysis should jive with the
MOD.
> To dive the tank, you can remove the tape so as not to litter ( and
> obviously the only thing we go by in water by is MOD ) , but if you do not
> use the tank, retape it and the valve, rewrite the contents and date, and
> transport that way, including partially full tanks that you intend to
reuse
> ( I reuse my deco tanks for two dives usually, so I may write something
like
> "2000 psi 50%  10-18-00") . If you use it and are not going to reuse it,
it
> is now assumed that the tank has some amount of that gas in it, but can
not
> be used again unless reanalyzed, so is not retagged. It can not be stored
> full without a tape, and it can not be transported full without a tape.
> Doubles can not be stored untagged if they have gas in them, and if that
> mistake is made, dump the partial gas and remix rather than adding to a
mix.
> A lot of people fool themselves this way on the helium %.
>
> Now , sorry about the car post to Kane, but he is such a Granny. He drives
a
> Jaguar, if you can believe that one. I like the most rocket I can get, and
> they just came up with a new one that is beyond ridiculous, so I got one.
So
> what.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Braunbehrens [mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co*]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 12:30 AM
> To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Pony's and deep air
>
> The subject of ponies and deep air has recently come up on Scuba-L as
> some of you may have noticed.  Some of the people have asked for
> clarification of the DIR view on this, and I've tried my best, but
> being the stroke I am I failed miserably.
>
> So, if someone here would be so kind as to give me a concise and if
> possible reasonably polite rundown on the DIR position on Pony
> bottles and on deep air, I would appreciate it.  I already know that
> DIR is against the use of ponies, so you can leave that part out.
> Exact reasons why would be welcome.  As far as deep air goes, what
> constitutes "deep", and some references to actual fatalities brought
> on by deep air (and I'm not talking 400 feet here, but people who
> kicked the bucket doing what a rec. diver might do on a deep air
> dive).
>
> I know this stuff is in the archives, but I'm hoping someone has
> something like a baker's dozen handy for these two topics.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Paul B.
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]