I hope all the recent e-mail exchange on sport divers, archaeologists, laws and wreck preservation isn't giving readers the idea that there is an impossible gap between professional archaeologists and sport divers. Many archaeologists rely heavily on support from sport divers and avocational archaeologists--and enjoy working with them. I, myself, was a sport diver for years before becoming an archaeologist. In fact, it was the enjoyment and satisfaction I received from my volunteer work with professional archaeologists that convinced me to change my profession from engineering to archaeology. I directed a shipwreck excavation in Virginia (a WELL-PRESERVED 200-year-old British ship) which could not have been completed without the hundreds of divers who volunteered their help (we logged over 25,000 volunteer hours, most of them by divers!). I have thoroughly enjoyed working with other avocational groups, especially the Maritime Archaeological and Historical Society (MAHS) which has done excellent work--they even had a booth at this year's SHA Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology in Washington, DC. There are literally scores of "happy stories" I could relate, but most of you know them already. The only point I wanted to make is that those of us who have been and will continue to be dedicated to cooperating with all types of groups and individuals on archaeological research and education should not be discouraged that not everyone will agreee with us. There are folks on both ends of the spectrum that will never seek a viable compromise but, fortunately, there are enough of us "in the middle" who will continue to work to improve the system.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]