Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Matej Simonic / Testing LTD" <mail@te*.si*>
To: "GUE_Lista" <quest@gu*.co*>
Cc: "Aquanaut_Lista" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>, <jj@gu*.co*>, <trey@ne*.co*>
Subject: EE6-14 O-ring
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:51:50 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C02C4E.01375A90
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

With some friends we have been watching the Main O-ring on EE canister =
lights. The latches are used only to seal the light on the surface, =
later on the water pressure takes over... But this can mean 500 kg force =
on 100 m depth. Is that good for the O-ring. Why is the seat (recess) =
for O-ring made that way to protect the O-ring from these excessive =
forces? Sure if the O-ring is pressed by 50 kg it would seal enough, so =
there is no need for the O-ring to be loaded by 500...
Would another O-ring that would seal sideways not only one frontal do =
any good (if the first one leaks)? Why not.
I am sure there is a reason behind it all and obviously it works great, =
I would just like to understand the reasoning behind it. I think it is =
not only cost related....

Thank you
Matej SImonic

------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C02C4E.01375A90
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-2" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2920.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>With some friends we have been watching =
the Main=20
O-ring on EE canister lights. The latches are used only to seal the =
light on the=20
surface, later on the water pressure takes over... But this can mean 500 =
kg=20
force on 100 m depth. Is that good for the O-ring. Why is the seat =
(recess) for=20
O-ring made that way to protect the O-ring from these excessive forces? =
Sure if=20
the O-ring is pressed by 50 kg it would seal enough, so there is no need =
for the=20
O-ring to be loaded by 500...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CE" size=3D2>Would another O-ring that would =
seal sideways=20
not only one frontal do any good (if the first one leaks)? Why =
not.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CE" size=3D2>I am sure there is a reason behind =
it all and=20
obviously it works great, I would just like to understand the reasoning =
behind=20
it. I think it is not only cost related....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CE" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CE" size=3D2>Thank you</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CE" size=3D2>Matej =
SImonic</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0221_01C02C4E.01375A90--

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]