Dear Mr. Gunther, I am sorry but I must say your criticism *is not* constructive. I AM NOT associated to GUE, I am 10 thousand miles from nearest US port (Canary Islands, central east Atlantic, off Northwest Africa; yes, we are cannibals here :-) and I would like to stress the following: - The DIR framework appears to be a **very serious** approach which should be supported by, at least, the academics diving community; - Development of any serious approach costs lots of money, time and efforts; - These guys are shaping the first ever wholistic framework to diving (physical fitness, stay-out-of-drugs, healthy food, technical aspects of diving, true-gear, etc.); Our fellow marine science students, here, are getting diving certificates (PADI & similar) after a single week of training (in cases after a *single day*) and doing a bunch of trial-and-error-in-water stuff due to the lack of a **serious conceptual framework**. Please, be constructive. aldo.solari@ho*.se* www.ccbb.ulpgc.es/fish-ecology/solaris ___ TGunther@co*.co* Tcc> << This is being done as we speak. GUE will not only be Tcc> publishing a DIR text in the very near future ... >> Tcc> Which of course should not stand alone in anyones thinking, Tcc> but be augmented by quality training available through GUE. Tcc> Tod -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]