Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "tim humphrey" <tim@hu*.ne*>
To: "Kent Lind" <klind@al*.ne*>
Cc: "Tech Diver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: ditching the weight belt
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 10:59:03 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C01983.CCC5D020
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Many thanks Kent for an excellent and constructive post. I certainly =
will not be letting go but I think the overall non-clutter aspects of =
the principle are, as you say, where I should be focussing.
A big thank you to all who replied. All your suggestions will be taken =
on board. I feel I have learned a great deal.
Safe diving,
Tim
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Kent Lind=20
  To: tim humphrey=20
  Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:49 AM
  Subject: RE: ditching the weight belt


  Tim:
  =20
  You simply can't get yourself and your rig both neutral when cold =
water diving with doubles.  It's impossible.  You CAN do it singles =
diving and in warm water situations. But with a drysuit you just need =
too much weight on your body to get neutral and setting up a doubles rig =
to be independently neutral would mean using aluminum tanks and big =
wings.
  =20
  In the end you'd be way overweighted.  Because the amount of weight to =
get your body in a drysuit to neutral buoyany is WAY more weight than =
you need when wearing doubles.=20
  =20
  Here in Alaska our conditions are very similar to the North Sea, if =
not colder.
  =20
  What most serious divers do is just accept the fact that your rig and =
you will not be both independently neutral when separated.  With a =
drysuit you won't lose your rig because you'll still be attached at the =
drysuit hose even if you take it off.  Furthermore, the only real =
instance that you'd be taking it off would be inside a wreck in a =
serious restriction in which case neither you nor your rig are going =
anywhere.  In open water there's no need to take the rig off and you =
don't want to.  With a proper DIR rig with no serious points for =
entanglement then you shouldn't get entangled in stuff. The only real =
place where you can get tangled is with the manifold which you can reach =
with your hands anyway.  With nothing attached to your tank and no tank =
boots or other crap hanging off you then your risk of entanglement is =
very low.   That's what you should focus on.
  =20
  Also, try taking off your rig underwater.  It's really not that much =
of a big deal even if it is negative and you are positive.  You just =
don't let go, keep an arm through one shoulder strap.  If you do let go =
you are still connected with the drysuit,
  =20
  Regards,
  =20
  Kent Lind
  Juneau, Alaska
  =20
  =20
    -----Original Message-----
    From: tim humphrey [mailto:tim@hu*.ne*]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 2:26 PM
    To: Tech Diver
    Subject: ditching the weight belt


    I am in the process of converting to the DIR system as it seems an =
emminently logical, efficient and sensible method. My present diving is =
mainly wrecks in the eastern end of the English Channel. My only concern =
with the system is the ditching of the weight belt in favour of V =
weights. Having said that I am aware of the benefits of the streamlining =
and less clutter, which greatly appeals, but please put my mind at  rest =
as to what happens if you need to remove your kit at depth, say in the =
event of an entanglement. Yes, I know you should always have your buddy =
for such occasions, but it is very easy to get separated, especially =
when the vis is down to the 1 metre mark. I would emphasise this is a =
hypothetical situation: I have been entangled and I have lost my buddy, =
but never at the same time. The thought of my kit heading south as I =
head north is not one I wish to contemplate. I am sure there must be a =
simple answer.
    Tim

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C01983.CCC5D020
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3105.105" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">Many thanks Kent for an excellent =
and=20
constructive post. I certainly will not be letting go but I think the =
overall=20
non-clutter aspects of the principle are, as you say, where I should be=20
focussing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">A big thank you to all who replied. =
All your=20
suggestions will be taken on board. I feel I have learned a great=20
deal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">Safe diving,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">Tim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A href=3D"mailto:klind@al*.ne*" title=3Dklind@al*.ne*>Kent =
Lind</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
href=3D"mailto:tim@hu*.ne*"=20
  title=3Dtim@hu*.ne*>tim humphrey</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 08, =
2000 6:49=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: ditching the =
weight=20
  belt</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2>Tim:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial size=3D2>You=20
  simply can't get yourself and your rig both neutral when cold water =
diving=20
  with doubles.  It's impossible.  You CAN do it singles =
diving and in=20
  warm water situations. But with a drysuit you just need too much =
weight on=20
  your body to get neutral and setting up a doubles rig to be =
independently=20
  neutral would mean using aluminum tanks and big =
wings.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial size=3D2>In=20
  the end you'd be way overweighted.  Because the amount of weight =
to get=20
  your body in a drysuit to neutral buoyany is WAY more weight than you =
need=20
  when wearing doubles. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial size=3D2>Here=20
  in Alaska our conditions are very similar to the North Sea, if not=20
  colder.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial size=3D2>What=20
  most serious divers do is just accept the fact that your rig and you =
will not=20
  be both independently neutral when separated.  With a drysuit you =
won't=20
  lose your rig because you'll still be attached at the drysuit hose =
even if you=20
  take it off.  Furthermore, the only real instance that you'd be =
taking it=20
  off would be inside a wreck in a serious restriction in which case =
neither you=20
  nor your rig are going anywhere.  In open water there's no need =
to take=20
  the rig off and you don't want to.  With a proper DIR rig with no =
serious=20
  points for entanglement then you shouldn't get entangled in stuff. The =
only=20
  real place where you can get tangled is with the manifold which you =
can reach=20
  with your hands anyway.  With nothing attached to your tank and =
no tank=20
  boots or other crap hanging off you then your risk of entanglement is =
very=20
  low.   That's what you should focus on.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2>Also, try taking off your rig underwater.  It's really =
not that=20
  much of a big deal even if it is negative and you are positive.  =
You just=20
  don't let go, keep an arm through one shoulder strap.  If you do =
let go=20
  you are still connected with the drysuit,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2>Regards,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial size=3D2>Kent=20
  Lind</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2>Juneau, Alaska</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D260494105-08092000><FONT color=3D#0000ff =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
    <DIV align=3Dleft class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
    size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> tim humphrey=20
    [mailto:tim@hu*.ne*]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, September 06, =
2000 2:26=20
    PM<BR><B>To:</B> Tech Diver<BR><B>Subject:</B> ditching
the weight=20
    belt<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">I am in the process of =
converting to the=20
    DIR system as it seems an emminently logical, efficient and sensible =
method.=20
    My present diving is mainly wrecks in the eastern end of the English =

    Channel. My only concern with the system is the ditching of the =
weight belt=20
    in favour of V weights. Having said that I am aware of the benefits =
of the=20
    streamlining and less clutter, which greatly appeals, but please put =

    my mind at  rest as to what happens if you need to remove =
your kit=20
    at depth, say in the event of an entanglement. Yes, I know you =
should always=20
    have your buddy for such occasions, but it is very easy to get =
separated,=20
    especially when the vis is down to the 1 metre mark. I would =
emphasise this=20
    is a hypothetical situation: I have been entangled and I have lost =
my buddy,=20
    but never at the same time. The thought of my kit heading south as I =
head=20
    north is not one I wish to contemplate. I am sure there must be a =
simple=20
    answer.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New =
Roman">Tim</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML
>

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C01983.CCC5D020--

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]