Scott Hunsucker wrote: > Reread the statement he made a little more carefully. He said it "is > offset enough to open up the vessels" This should not be enough to > completely "reverse" (return to complete normalcy) the constriction per se, Ah, there's one of the problems. When I said "reverse", I meant reverse the trend, not return to complete normalcy. > I am sure there is a mild > constricting effect at normal diving PO2s, but this is sufficiently offset > by the ability of the oxygen to continue to diffuse in spite of the > constriction, and should also be relieved (not reveresed) by breaks. OK, so let me reiterate to see that I understand correctly. It sounds to me that yes, even with non-WKPP-style dives, that the breaks will provide some relief to the constriction but that due to the O2's ability to continue to diffuse it's not likely to be a big factor. When you get closer to the WKPP-style exposures, the difference becomes greater. So I also take it from this that this phenomenon is not the primary means by which offgassing efficiency is increased during gas breaks. So I assume that the other two reasons that Trey listed: 1) Lungs not adding layers 2) Prevention/halt/reversal of asthma-like reaction, are the primary reasons the offgassing improves. If that's the case, could you elaborate on these reactions? > Did this provide some clarification? As always, yes. Thank you! -Dave -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]