From: <KRussellTX@ao*.co*> To: <donburke56@ne*.ne*>; <cobber@ci*.co*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: 27 August, 2000 12:50 > Don, > > It just so happens that I have searched the archives and came up with very > little to preclude (notice I said PRECLUDE) the use of EAN80 as a deco gas. Go look again. I found it with no trouble. > If someone wants to use EAN50 and 100% O2 for their team then I certainly see > no reason to object. But who does Jim think he is to criticize the choice of > EAN36 and EAN80 as deco gasses when he has absolutely no clue as to the > technical reasons for the other decision. He knows only "Monkey see, Monkey do" from the DIR bible. A clone of the worst kind. Jim went after your assertion that getting out of the water fastest was the only consideration. Read your response to that. "No clue" is certainly a good term for it. As for Jim being a DIR clone, I have met and talked to him and nothing could be further from the truth. > I am interested in hearing more about your allusion to the surface as a deco > stop and to gas purity issues, and specifically more about what these two > subjects have to do with not using EAN36 and EAN80 as the deco gas selection. Then actually read the archives. If you reply to this, don't expect an answer from me. You are now on my twitlist along with Michael Black. I expect he will appreciate the company. Love and kisses, Don Burke Chesapeake, Virginia _______________________________________________ Why pay for something you could get for free? NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]