By having a less precise display, you increase the margin of error. Also, with the decimal points you can see if the display is still moving. Without it you may be off by as much as 1.5 %, and that's just in the reading. Any error in the sensor compounds that. Then there might be an error in the calibration if it's done with static air instead of being done at the same flow rate as the air from the scuba tank. All these errors compound each other. For this reason I usually try to err on the site of safety. This means that I use the next higher percentage for purposes of O2 toxicity, and the next lower one for purposes of N2 absorption. Phi Le wrote: ~ >Dave, > >Assuming this is 2-digit and no decimal places, that should cover the range >from 00 to 99 for O2. > >How accurate do you need your mix to be ? And do you know how accurate your >sensor is ? :-) > >-Phi -- Paul Braunbehrens mailto:Bakalite@ba*.co* http://www.daw-mac.com Mailing list for digital audio on the mac -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]