Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>, "Jarrod Jablonski" <JJ@gu*.co*>
Subject: Re: backup reg - why, was and still is logic
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:51:51 -0400
JJ, the objectives of many of the real idiots out
there is to try to misinterpret things to find what
they think is some "loophole" in our system  , which
is always based on their own lack of experience and
knowledge. This guy obviously can't see the details of
what you really use, so start up this crap hoping to
somehow show us up.

I guess the fact that you and I hold all the records
and have  been diving together for ten years and have
the best track record in diving and that you have gone
on to start a trianging agency ( GUE ) to provide real
information rather than the slop these idiots are
throwing at us means nothing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarrod Jablonski <JJ@gu*.co*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 11:21 AM
Subject: backup reg - why, was and still is logic


>Hi all,
>
>There seems to be some confusion going on here and
when my name is part of
>that confusion I like to help dispel
misunderstandings. The purpose of the
>necklace regulator attachment is to firmly hold the
reserve second stage
>below the chin. The obvious way to do this is to use
a piece of surgical
>tubing connected via a wire tie to the mouthpiece.
This has been my most
>common method of attachment for many years. The worst
way to attach the
>second stage is by making a loop in the surgical
tubing and placing the
>second stage mouthpiece into this loop. This is a
problem because it is
>very likely to fall out of the retaining loop.
Several years of instruction
>along with personal experience have proven this to be
a dangerous placement
>as it comes free far too easily and is therefore not
where it is needed-
>usually at precisely the worst time. I do have a form
of loop on one of my
>back rigs but this is a high tensile strength shock
cord that is tied such
>that the noose tightens around the mouthpiece when
you pull on the
>necklace. This is not designed to be pulled free or
to make it easy to
>remove the second stage but to simplify attachment
and allow reattachment
>for those not carrying wire ties. Please copy me on
any areas where my
>input is desired as I am not subscribed to the list.
>
>Good Diving,
>JJ
>
>
>Many people on
> >> >this list use the loop, as I said above from
what
>I
> >> understand so does JJ. I
> >> >am asking you to show us why you are more right
on
> >> this issue, than me, JJ,
> >> >and the rest of us? If you show us the stats,
and
> >> they agree with what you
> >> >say, I will gladly admit that permanently
>attaching
> >> the bungee is better.
>Jarrod Jablonski
>
>President-
>Global Underwater Explorers www.gue.com
>CEO Extreme Exposure www.extreme-exposure.com
>VP Halcyon Manufacturing www.halcyon.net,
www.browniedive.com, www.tankfill.com
>
>Global Underwater Explorers www.gue.com
>GUE is a non-profit educational, research, and
exploratory organization
>with hundreds of dedicated members around the world.
>
>Extreme Exposure www.extreme-exposure.com
>Extreme Exposure and Halcyon manufacturing produce
some of the scuba
>industry's most novel and robust diving equipment
designed by many of
>diving's most active explorers.
>
>
>
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]