This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0163_01BFF7DE.E1D07A40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill, this is sad but real - Gilliam continues to have his extremely = negative influence on diving. The guy just will not let up with the = stupidity. What we all need to do is find operators who will DIR and avoid the = rest and point them out. Sooner or later the idiots , and this Odyssey = clown is obviously severely ignorant , will be at least embarrassed into = doing things the way they should be done. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Bott <aquadart@ix*.ne*.co*> To: Trey <trey@ne*.co*>; techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Date: Thursday, July 27, 2000 3:14 PM Subject: Re: Why We Still Have A Big Problem In Tec Diving =20 =20 G, =20 Is this a joke or is it for real?? It is almost to stupid to be for = real. =20 At 05:54 AM 7/27/00 , Trey wrote: =20 > > > >From: <mailto:Odyssey@ma*.fm*> > > > > >Subject: Helium > > > > > > > Thank you for your interest in the > "Odyssey". > > > > Currently we do not use trimix on the "Odyssey" > and we have no plans to > > > > use it or allow it in the future. I spoke about > this subject with Mr. > > > > Bret Gilliam, President of Technical Divers > International, when he was > > > > here diving with us a few months ago. Without > discussing my thoughts > >with > > > > him first, I asked him his opinion of whether he > though we should have > > > > helium available for trimix. His answer followed > my thoughts exactly. > > > > > > > > Mainly, the maximum depths here in Truk do > not warrant the use of > > > > trimix. There are no dive sites that there is a > reason to go over 200'. > > > > Most of the deep wrecks are 205' in the sand. > Even if you go to this > > > > depth, there is so little to see there that you > certainly won't be there > > > > for any length of time. The max depth on the > deep sites would be around > > > > 190' and the majority of the time would be > around 170'-180' and > > > > shallower. The narcosis level at these depths > should be acceptible for > > > > experienced technical divers. The maximum PO2 > level of air at these > > > > depths is also acceptible at 1.5 on air. There > are no currents to fight, > > > > the water is warm and the visibility is good, > therefore, stress and work > > > > levels should be low for experienced divers. > > > =20 -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to = `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to = `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.=20 =20 Bill (aquadart) Bott=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0163_01BFF7DE.E1D07A40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2> <STRONG>Bill, this is sad but = real -=20 Gilliam continues to have his extremely negative influence on = diving. The=20 guy just will not let up with the stupidity.</STRONG></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2><STRONG></STRONG></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT size=3D2> What we all need to do is find = operators who=20 will DIR and avoid the rest and point them out. Sooner or later the = idiots , and=20 this Odyssey clown is obviously severely ignorant , will be at least = embarrassed=20 into doing things the way they should be done.</FONT></STRONG></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: = 5px"> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original = Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20 </B>Bill Bott <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:aquadart@ix*.ne*.co*">aquadart@ix.netcom.com</A>><BR>= <B>To:=20 </B>Trey <<A = href=3D"mailto:trey@ne*.co*">trey@netdor.com</A>>;=20 techdiver <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:techdiver@aquanaut.com">techdiver@aquanaut.com</A>><BR>= <B>Date:=20 </B>Thursday, July 27, 2000 3:14 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Why We = Still Have=20 A Big Problem In Tec Diving<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>G,<BR><BR>Is this a = joke or=20 is it for real?? It is <U>almost</U> to stupid to be for=20 real.<BR><BR>At 05:54 AM 7/27/00 , Trey wrote:<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE cite type =3D cite>> > > >From: <<A=20 href=3D"mailto:Odyssey@ma*.fm*" eudora =3D=20 autourl>mailto:Odyssey@ma*.fm*</A>><BR>><BR>> > > = >Subject: Helium<BR>> > ><BR>> > >=20 > Thank you for your interest in = the<BR>>=20 "Odyssey".<BR>> > > > Currently we do not = use=20 trimix on the<BR>"Odyssey"<BR>> and we have no = plans=20 to<BR>> > > > use it or allow it in the future. I=20 spoke<BR>about<BR>> this subject with Mr.<BR>> > > = > Bret=20 Gilliam, President of Technical Divers<BR>> International, = when he=20 was<BR>> > > > here diving with us a few months ago. = Without<BR>> discussing my thoughts<BR>> >with<BR>> = >=20 > > him first, I asked him his opinion of = whether<BR>he<BR>>=20 though we should have<BR>> > > > helium available = for=20 trimix. His answer<BR>followed<BR>> my thoughts = exactly.<BR>> >=20 > ><BR>> > > > = Mainly,=20 the maximum depths here in Truk<BR>do<BR>> not warrant the = use=20 of<BR>> > > > trimix. There are no dive sites that = there=20 is<BR>a<BR>> reason to go over 200'.<BR>> > > > = Most of=20 the deep wrecks are 205' in the sand.<BR>> Even if you go to=20 this<BR>> > > > depth, there is so little to see = there=20 that<BR>you<BR>> certainly won't be there<BR>> > > = > for=20 any length of time. The max depth on the<BR>> deep sites = would be=20 around<BR>> > > > 190' and the majority of the time = would=20 be<BR>> around 170'-180' and<BR>> > > > = shallower. The=20 narcosis level at these depths<BR>> should be acceptible = for<BR>>=20 > > > experienced technical divers. The maximum = PO2<BR>>=20 level of air at these<BR>> > > > depths is also = acceptible=20 at 1.5 on air. There<BR>> are no currents to fight,<BR>> = > >=20 > the water is warm and the visibility is good,<BR>> = therefore,=20 stress and work<BR>> > > > levels should be low for=20 experienced divers.<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR><BR>--<BR>Send = mail for=20 the `techdiver' mailing list to = `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.<BR>Send=20 subscribe/unsubscribe requests to = `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.=20 </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Bill (aquadart) Bott </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0163_01BFF7DE.E1D07A40-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]