Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 04:57:03 -0400
From: max <max@xd*.co*>
To: Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
CC: Dan Mackay <dan@no*.co*>, max@xd*.co*
Subject: Good post on HID lights

--------------08C00FB73B0E0D69329AA13C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Here is a quality post on HID lights from Dan Mackay in a response on
the Techdiver.com discussion group

Hi Max,

The HID works great. It is a marvellous piece of kit. It is kind of
funny
the way I use it though. I thought that it was an all purpose light and
I
guess in general it is. I find however that it shines (pun intended) in
pitch black clear water. In moderately silty water it is a great
performer
as well. In really silty water I take the HID off and put the 50 watt
halogen back on.

I use the 14 watt HID and it far outshines the 50 watt halogen. I have
not
done a side by side comparison but I would say that it is every bit as
bright as the 100watt halogen (24v) system that I have used for video.
The
problem that arises in water that is not completely dark is that the HID
is
'too' good. It burns at a color temperature of ~5500kelvin. It is
practically invisible except for the object that you are illuminating.
For
example imagine this. Turn on a normal incandescent light in the water
and
you will see the path that the light is taking by the yellow color and
also
the object that you are trying to illuminate. There are a couple of
factors
at work here like refraction and diffusion. Turn a HID on in the same
clear
water and if you are not shining the light on something you cannot tell
that
it is even turned on except when you look into the lens! This makes for
a
great light for the cold dark wrecks and as long as it is dark it works
excellent in silty water. It is the mid water, not quite dark were the
characteristics that make these lights so wonderful work against them.

Other than being able to see  for miles with these lights, Halcyon has
made
some modifications to the light head. I think I got one of the used one
the
the first of the new style that Barry Miller made. The new ballast is
flat
and sits nicely down on behind your wrist. It is far better in terms of
comfort than the old box style.

If you buy a light make sure you get one with an EO connector and send
your
existing light head down to have an EO connector put on. (That is if you

have a test tube style light head). That way if the HID dies it is a
simple
matter of changing light heads in water. I always carry a spare test
tube
light head. I had a HID die as I was at the bottom of the tube going in
the
upstream side of Cow. For those folks that know this cave and that
particular spot know how tight it is. It took me about 30 seconds to
swap
heads and continue the dive. It is like carrying two primaries!

Another consideration is the burn time. I get better than three hours
burn
with the 14 watt HID. I only need to charge it once a weekend. Big
consideration for remote areas.

As for the 18 watt, my buddy Johnny has one and I can't tell the
difference.
It is sort of asking how bright is bright. That is a 22% increase in the

wattage but once again it looked the same to me. The 40 watt version
should
really be kick butt. I would think that its real application would be
for
high end video.

Once you purchase a light you are stuck with that particular ballast.
The
differnt watt bulbs are not interchangeable. The are a heck of a light
and
if you have enough money I would recommend them to anyone. Be prepared
for
the sticker shock.

Dan



--------------08C00FB73B0E0D69329AA13C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<i>Here is a quality post on HID lights from Dan Mackay in a response on
the Techdiver.com discussion group</i>
<p>Hi Max,<i></i>
<p>The HID works great. It is a marvellous piece of kit. It is kind of
funny
<br>the way I use it though. I thought that it was an all purpose light
and I
<br>guess in general it is. I find however that it shines (pun intended)
in
<br>pitch black clear water. In moderately silty water it is a great
performer
<br>as well. In really silty water I take the HID off and put the 50 watt
<br>halogen back on.
<p>I use the 14 watt HID and it far outshines the 50 watt halogen. I have
not
<br>done a side by side comparison but I would say that it is every bit
as
<br>bright as the 100watt halogen (24v) system that I have used for video.
The
<br>problem that arises in water that is not completely dark is that the
HID is
<br>'too' good. It burns at a color temperature of ~5500kelvin. It is
<br>practically invisible except for the object that you are illuminating.
For
<br>example imagine this. Turn on a normal incandescent light in the water
and
<br>you will see the path that the light is taking by the yellow color
and also
<br>the object that you are trying to illuminate. There are a couple of
factors
<br>at work here like refraction and diffusion. Turn a HID on in the same
clear
<br>water and if you are not shining the light on something you cannot
tell that
<br>it is even turned on except when you look into the lens! This makes
for a
<br>great light for the cold dark wrecks and as long as it is dark it works
<br>excellent in silty water. It is the mid water, not quite dark were
the
<br>characteristics that make these lights so wonderful work against them.
<p>Other than being able to see  for miles with these lights, Halcyon
has made
<br>some modifications to the light head. I think I got one of the used
one the
<br>the first of the new style that Barry Miller made. The new ballast
is flat
<br>and sits nicely down on behind your wrist. It is far better in terms
of
<br>comfort than the old box style.
<p>If you buy a light make sure you get one with an EO connector and send
your
<br>existing light head down to have an EO connector put on. (That is if
you
<br>have a test tube style light head). That way if the HID dies it is
a simple
<br>matter of changing light heads in water. I always carry a spare test
tube
<br>light head. I had a HID die as I was at the bottom of the tube going
in the
<br>upstream side of Cow. For those folks that know this cave and that
<br>particular spot know how tight it is. It took me about 30 seconds to
swap
<br>heads and continue the dive. It is like carrying two primaries!
<p>Another consideration is the burn time. I get better than three hours
burn
<br>with the 14 watt HID. I only need to charge it once a weekend. Big
<br>consideration for remote areas.
<p>As for the 18 watt, my buddy Johnny has one and I can't tell the
difference.
<br>It is sort of asking how bright is bright. That is a 22% increase in
the
<br>wattage but once again it looked the same to me. The 40 watt version
should
<br>really be kick butt. I would think that its real application would
be for
<br>high end video.
<p>Once you purchase a light you are stuck with that particular ballast.
The
<br>differnt watt bulbs are not interchangeable. The are a heck of a light
and
<br>if you have enough money I would recommend them to anyone. Be prepared
for
<br>the sticker shock.
<p>Dan
<br> 
<br> </html>

--------------08C00FB73B0E0D69329AA13C--

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]