Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Thomas Tukker" <thomas@ha*.ne*>
To: "Ian Puleston" <DiverIan@pa*.ne*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Oxygen Toxicity - using 100% in open water
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 20:43:26 -0400
What if using two computers is convoluted solution to a non existent problem
and thus makes you a stroke?

THOMAS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Puleston [mailto:DiverIan@pa*.ne*]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 1:18 PM
> To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: RE: Oxygen Toxicity - using 100% in open water
>
>
> What if a battery dies? The separately powered redundant backup
> system takes
> over. What if the display dies? You flip it over and use the redundant
> display on the back. How does the backup know about your gas switches? The
> primary passed that info to it whilst they were both operational. What if
> you lose a gas? You hit the "Lost Gas" button. Pyle / WKPP stops? Download
> the relevant software to the computer (note the Abyss Explorer is going to
> be downloadable - hopefully it'll start a trend).
>
> All the problems you've brought up could be solved by a well designed
> computer today. Like I said - the right computer for tech diving
> doesn't yet
> exist, but that doesn't mean that it won't one day.
>
> > How useful are your 2 computers when the deco that the
> computers suggests
> > is wrong anyway?
>
> What's the alternative - cut tables using software on a PC. What if its
> wrong? What if you made an error copying the tables to your slate? What if
> you lose your slate?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ScottBonis@ao*.co* [mailto:ScottBonis@ao*.co*]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 4:28 PM
> > To: se2schul@uw*.ca*; donburke56@ya*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
> > Subject: Re: Oxygen Toxicity - using 100% in open water
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 6/11/00 3:03:53 PM, se2schul@uw*.ca* writes:
> > << Scott,
> >
> > What if you lose a gas?  You can't reprogram you computer in the
> > water.  You
> >
> > computer schedule becomes invalid.  What then? >>
> >
> > Hi Steve,
> > Thanks for raising some good points that are worth discussing.
> > If you loose
> > a gas during a dive, the situation is then the same as if you
> > lose a gas with
> > any predetermined dive plan.  You pull out the waterproof dive
> > tables, use
> > the computers as depth gauges / bottom timers, and figure a worst
> > case (depth
> > and time) plan for deco. with the gasses you have available.
> >
> >
> > << 2 computers sounds pretty expensive, and about as useful as
> > diving with 2
> >
> > wings.  You just fixed a problem (unreliable dive computer) by adding a
> >
> > second computer.  Now the problems are compounded. >>
> >
> > I really don't think anything is compounded.  One computer can be
> > tucked away
> > in a pocket so it is not even seen unless it is needed.  And if
> > it is needed,
> > then the other computer has failed and so is ignored.  Both
> > computers contain
> > the same information so what's to compound?  And as far as expense is
> > concerned, when the cost of life support equipment becomes a strong
> > consideration in technical diving, then perhaps it's time to
> > consider some
> > other avocation.
> >
> >
> > << How useful are your 2 computers when the deco that the
> > computers suggests
> > is
> >
> > wrong anyway?       Steve >>
> >
> > Remember please that I'm not proposing the use of wrist
> computers at this
> > time, for extended decompression diving.  I'm only pointing out
> > that a number
> > of the arguments against them are really not valid.  However, I
> > do completely
> > agree with this last point of yours in many cases.  But it has been my
> > experience that the wrist computers are simply more conservative,
> > rather than
> > being "wrong."   And as time goes on, I imagine the algorithms
> > employed in
> > these units will get more realistic and then perhaps the wrist
> > computers can
> > be useful.  I just don't like eliminating their use with a wave
> > of the hand
> > and a number of invalid arguments.
> >
> > Thanks for the response to my thoughts.
> >
> > Take care and safe diving,       Scott
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > From: <ScottBonis@ao*.co*>
> >
> > To: <donburke56@ya*.co*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> >
> > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 1:00 PM
> >
> > Subject: Re: Oxygen Toxicity - using 100% in open water
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi Don, again,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > While I need to emphasize that I am definitely not recommending
> > the use of
> >
> > > wrist computers for extended decompression diving, the reasons you are
> >
> > giving
> >
> > > for not using them are, IMHO, not valid reasons for eliminating
> > them from
> >
> > > consideration.  I say again that simply carrying a second
> computer will
> >
> > > protect against any possible failure of your primary unit.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > But "what about informing two computers of my gas changes
> > during the dive?"
> >
> > > you say.  Well actually, it is not necessary.  Consider for
> example, the
> >
> > > Cochran three gas computer.  It is not a trimix computer but
> will handle
> >
> > > three nitrox / air mixes and automatically switch to the deco
> > gasses at the
> >
> > > correct time.  All I need to do is to program into the computer
> > the depth at
> >
> > > which I plan to switch to my second deco. gas and the computer
> > then does the
> >
> > > rest.  In fact, I cannot change the programming of the computer
> > after I have
> >
> > > entered the water.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Consider for example, a dive to say, 100 feet on air for a long
> > time and
> > EAN50
> >
> > > and O2 as the deco gasses.  I would need to program in 20 feet as the
> >
> > > depth to switch to my second deco gas (the O2).  The computer
> > would then do
> >
> > > the rest.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > "How does the computer know when to switch to the deco.
> > gasses?" you ask.
> >
> > > Good question.  Magic!!!  No not really, the computer is an air
> > integrated
> >
> > > unit connected to the back tanks.  It keeps track of my breathing rate
> > during
> >
> > > the dive.  And when that breathing rate goes to zero, it knows
> > that I am no
> >
> > > longer breathing off of the back tanks so it switches to the
> > first deco. gas
> >
> > > (the EAN 50 in this example).  Then, later in the deco
> > schedule, when I have
> >
> > > progressed up to 20 feet, it knows to switch to the second
> > deco. gas (O2 in
> >
> > > this case).
> >
> > >
> >
> > > As you can see, no "informing the computer" during the dive is
> > necessary, so
> >
> > > a second computer stowed away conveniently, serves well as a
> > backup should a
> >
> > > failure occur in the primary unit.  Of course a set of waterproof deco
> > tables
> >
> > > must be taken also (with the computers serving as depth
> gauges / bottom
> >
> > > timers), to serve as a second backup should something unusual
> > occur during
> >
> > > the dive.  After all, the well trained and experienced human
> > brain is still
> >
> > > the best dive computer around, by far.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > So as I said previously, I need to emphasize that I am certainly not
> >
> > > recommending using wrist dive computers for extended
> > decompression dives at
> >
> > > this time.  But I believe the reasons you are stating for not
> > using them are
> >
> > > not valid reasons to preclude their use.  I do agree with you
> > however, that
> >
> > > sometime in the future these computers may have reached the state of
> > maturity
> >
> > > where we will be able to depend on them for extended
> > decompression dives.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Take care and safe diving,     Scott
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > In a message dated 6/11/00 8:08:25 AM, donburke56@ya*.co* writes:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > << DB>A computer failure on a deco stop dive isn't nearly
> >
> > > that easy in that vital information about your deco
> >
> > > obligation went away with the computer.  Perhaps one
> >
> > > day there will be a computer with an independent,
> >
> > > redundant system that can fix this properly.  There
> >
> > > are other issues as well.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > SB> I can't speak to the "other issues", but this one
> >
> > > is a non-problem.  Simply take a second computer.  And
> >
> > > remember, there may be no significant difference
> >
> > > between the failure rate of dive computers and the
> >
> > > failure rate of the electronic depth gauges / bottom
> >
> > > timers commonly used in technical diving.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Scott,
> >
> > >   The rub here is the gas changes.  The Nitrex (I
> >
> > > think that was the name) computer needs to be told
> >
> > > about each gas change.  IMO doing this on two
> >
> > > computers during a dive is a bit much.  Two computers
> >
> > > in the same case, (but independent pressure housings)
> >
> > > operated by a double set of switches might fill the
> >
> > > bill.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >   Make no mistake, I _really_ like the display on my
> >
> > > Oceanic but I have been screwed by electronic devices
> >
> > > too often to bet my life on one.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >   The digital depth guages can be backed up with your
> >
> > > reel and bottom timers can be backed up with your
> >
> > > watch.  It's also pretty easy to find a home for an
> >
> > > extra watch or an extra depth guage (like maybe on
> >
> > > your buddy).  Since you don't need to look at these
> >
> > > devices until the primary fails, they can be stashed
> >
> > > away.  Not so with a computer that must be informed of
> >
> > > gas changes.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > There are some watches out there that can give you
> >
> > > depth, so there's a possible backup to backup.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The fact that I'm paranoid doesn't mean these devices
> >
> > > aren't out to get me. :)
> >
> > >
> >
> > > SB>Take care and safe diving
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Same to ya >> >>
> >
> > --
> > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]